CAN WE EXTINGUISH FIRES USING ACOUSTIC WAVES INSTEAD OF WATER?

CAN WE EXTINGUISH FIRES USING ACOUSTIC WAVES INSTEAD OF WATER?

Since the beginning of civilization, mankind has been extinguishing fires using water. Of course, we now have foam, powders, gases and other chemicals, but water remains one of our principal weapons against fire.

And now comes an interesting possibility: using sound waves to extinguish flames.

Why is that important?

Because water is becoming an increasingly precious commodity. During the 2024 El Niño, 131 Philippine LGUs declared a state of calamity, while some communities experienced serious water shortages. Can you imagine fighting a fire in the middle of a drought?

That would indeed be a case of double jeopardy.

Interestingly, this is not just science fiction. Research has already demonstrated that acoustic waves can extinguish flames by creating air movement and turbulence that destabilize the combustion process. Experiments have found effective suppression at low frequencies, including around 30–75 Hz, although the required acoustic pressure and conditions vary considerably.

And just recently, a 16-year-old Mexican student, Ángela Karime Venegas Hernández of CETIS 78 in Altamira, Tamaulipas, reportedly developed a prototype using a battery, frequency generator and speaker. Reports say she tested it more than 100 times and was able to extinguish several types of small flames. 

Now, before we get carried away, let us be realistic.

This does not mean that we should replace fire trucks with giant speakers tomorrow morning.

Acoustic suppression has limitations. It works particularly well with certain small, open flames, but sound does not provide the cooling effect of water. Large structural fires, deep-seated fires and wildfires are entirely different challenges.

Nevertheless, why shouldn't we study it?

Which government agency should lead?

The Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP) seems like the obvious agency because it understands the practical requirements of firefighting. But surely the DOST should also be involved because this is fundamentally a science and engineering question.

And there is another question I would ask the BFP:

How much water will our firefighters need in the future—and where will that water come from?

In March 2026, for example, the Ilocos Norte Water District was already urging authorities to consider alternative water sources for firefighting because of water scarcity. In 2024, BFP personnel in Iloilo were likewise looking for alternative sources because even natural water sources were being depleted.

So perhaps the issue is not water versus sound.

Perhaps it is water plus sound, depending on the type of fire.

And if a 16-year-old Mexican student can experiment with acoustic fire suppression, why can't our own students do the same?

Maybe all they need is the right laboratory, the right mentor and somebody in government who will say:

“Let's try it.”

Who knows? The next Filipino invention that saves millions of liters of water may already be inside the mind of a student we have never heard of.

RAMON IKE V. SENERES

www.facebook.com/ike.seneres  iseneres@yahoo.com  senseneres.blogspot.com  09088877282/09-12-2027


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES?

ARE GRAB DRIVERS EMPLOYEES OR INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS?

Recommendation to Consolidate Key Disease Control Agencies