HOW THE GOVERNMENT COULD IMPROVE CUSTOMER RELATIONS MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

HOW THE GOVERNMENT COULD IMPROVE CUSTOMER RELATIONS MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

Perhaps it is only my personal observation, but it seems to me that many foreign technologies take about twenty years before they are fully adopted in the Philippines. That may be understandable for heavy industrial equipment, but not necessarily for software. In the digital age, adoption could take only months, or even weeks in the private sector.

One good example is Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software. Businesses have been using CRM systems for decades to track customers, answer complaints, and improve services. Ironically, the government—which should be the most service-oriented institution of all—is still struggling to adopt it widely.

Before going any further, let us define what CRM is. Customer Relationship Management refers to a strategy and a set of digital tools that help organizations manage interactions with customers. It stores customer information, tracks requests or complaints, monitors service performance, and helps organizations respond faster and more efficiently.

Translated into the language of governance, the “customer” is the citizen—especially if he or she is a voter and a taxpayer. If a government agency cannot treat its citizens as valued customers, then one has to ask a serious question: what would it take for them to do so?

In my view, adopting CRM in government does not require rocket science. Nor does it require huge amounts of money. Many CRM platforms today are cloud-based and affordable. What is more important is a change in mindset—from simply processing paperwork to genuinely serving citizens.

To his credit, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has been advocating the digitalization of government services. That is a good start. But digitalization should not just mean scanning documents or putting forms online. It should also mean improving how the government communicates with citizens.

One of the first reforms that government agencies could implement is what experts call a “single source of truth.” Citizens should not have to repeat the same information to several agencies. Countries such as Estonia and Singapore have already implemented unified digital identity systems where citizens provide their data only once, and authorized agencies can access it securely.

Another improvement would be an omni-channel communication system. Citizens should be able to start a transaction online, follow up through a chatbot, and complete the process at a government office without losing their progress. Many private companies already operate this way.

Government CRM systems could also deliver proactive services. For example, instead of waiting for people to remember deadlines, agencies could automatically send reminders for passport renewals, business permits, or voter registration updates. A small reminder could prevent long lines, missed deadlines, and unnecessary penalties.

Transparency is another major benefit. Imagine being able to track the status of a permit or license application the same way we track a food delivery. Such a simple feature could dramatically increase public trust and reduce the number of phone calls asking for updates.

Fortunately, there are already some promising examples in the Philippines. The Department of Information and Communications Technology has been promoting the government’s digital transformation programs. The Bureau of Internal Revenue has introduced online tax filing systems, while the Social Security System operates digital portals that allow members to check contributions and submit requests online.

These are steps in the right direction, but they still need to be integrated into a unified citizen-service platform.

Ultimately, CRM is not just about technology. It is about attitude. If government agencies truly see citizens as partners rather than inconveniences, then CRM will naturally follow.

The real question now is this: if the private sector can do it quickly and efficiently, why can’t the government do the same? Perhaps the answer lies not in technology, but in political will and administrative leadership.

After all, better customer service in government is not a luxury. It is a basic duty owed to every Filipino citizen.

RAMON IKE V. SENERES

www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com senseneres.blogspot.com 09088877282/05-04-2027

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES?

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES? When we talk about the crime rate in the Philippines, we often assume that the figures we see are accurate reflections of reality. But have we ever paused to ask—how exactly is the crime rate computed? Where does this data come from, and how reliable is it? The computation of the crime rate in the Philippines is officially handled by the Philippine National Police (PNP). The formula itself is straightforward: Crime Rate = (Total Reported Crimes / Total Population) x 100,000 This simple equation gives us the number of crimes per 100,000 people, allowing for fair comparison across regions and time periods. However, the reality behind these numbers is more complex than it appears. Data from the Ground The foundation of our national crime rate is empirical data collected at the grassroots level—from individual police stations scattered across the country. Every reported crime is logged in local police blotters, forming the buil...
Read more

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS Dear Mr. President: May I ask who is going to be the arbiter or referee whenever there are overlaps in functions between two or more government agencies? I imagine that there would be no problem if these agencies would just cooperate and collaborate with each other, but what if they are unable to settle their differences and they would just end up throwing blame at each other or finger pointing at each other? Allow me to cite some examples. Who is supposed to take the lead in waste to energy projects? Is it supposed to be the DENR that is supposed to handle waste? Or is it supposed to be the DOE that is supposed to handle energy generation? Or is it supposed to be the DILG since it is the one that could direct or influence the waste to energy projects of LGUs? Who is supposed to take the lead in producing and promoting the use of biofuels? Is it supposed to be the DA, since the production of biofuels is supposed to be all about planting biofuel ...
Read more

BATTLING A MENTAL HEALTH EPIDEMIC

BATTLING A MENTAL HEALTH EPIDEMIC It is already a well-established fact that the Covid-19 pandemic also triggered what could be called a mental health pandemic. It does not mean however that since the Covid-19 pandemic has practically slowed down, that the mental health pandemic has also slowed down. For the record, no one has officially declared the mental health problem is already a pandemic, but I suggest that we already make that declaration, so that we could respond to the problem with the attention that it needs. As far as I know, no one has declared that the Covid-19 pandemic is officially over, with most governments merely saying that it is now reduced to being a manageable epidemic, whatever that means. What is clear however, is that no one has also declared that the mental health pandemic is also over, in fact many governments would even hesitate to call it an epidemic. The fact remains however that globally, 1 out of 8 are affected according to the WHO, and locally, at least...
Read more