WHAT ARE THE PROS AND CONS OF ALLOWING COUNTER FLOWS IN TRAFFIC CONTROL?

WHAT ARE THE PROS AND CONS OF ALLOWING COUNTER FLOWS IN TRAFFIC CONTROL?

Allowing counter-flow lanes—also known as contraflow or reversible lanes—is one of the most controversial tools in traffic management. It is often compared to emergency surgery on a city’s road network: when properly executed, it can relieve congestion quickly; when poorly managed, it can create confusion and serious safety risks.

The main advantage of counter-flow operations is efficiency. Traffic demand is rarely balanced. In many urban corridors, 70 percent of vehicles travel in one direction during peak hours while the opposite direction remains underutilized. By temporarily reversing selected lanes, authorities can increase capacity without building new roads. For developing cities where infrastructure expansion is expensive and slow, this approach can save billions in construction costs while improving travel time.

Counter-flow operations are also valuable during emergencies. In large-scale evacuations caused by typhoons, floods, or other disasters, reversing multiple lanes to direct traffic away from danger has proven to be one of the fastest ways to move large populations. Transport planners worldwide consider reversible lanes an essential component of disaster-preparedness planning.

However, the disadvantages are equally significant. The biggest risk is safety. Human driving behavior depends heavily on habit, and changing the direction of lanes—even temporarily—can lead to head-on collisions if motorists fail to notice signals or barriers. Studies of reversible-lane systems consistently show that safety performance depends heavily on physical separation such as movable concrete barriers and automated gate systems; without these, accident risks increase substantially. 

Driver confusion is another concern, particularly for visitors or occasional motorists unfamiliar with the route. Erratic braking, sudden lane changes, and hesitation are common when road rules appear to change daily. Pedestrians are also at risk because many instinctively look only in the expected direction of traffic when crossing streets.

This leads to an important policy question: if traffic enforcers manually manage counter-flow operations, what is the role of synchronized traffic lights? Ideally, counter-flow should not rely on manual direction alone. Modern cities integrate reversible lanes with Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)—overhead lane-control signals, automated barriers, surveillance cameras, and real-time traffic analytics—to minimize human error. Some countries are now using AI-assisted traffic modeling to predict congestion patterns and activate reversible lanes only when data shows clear benefits.

In the Philippine context, it is worth asking whether agencies are systematically consulting research institutions such as the National Center for Transportation Studies (NCTS) before implementing or expanding counter-flow schemes. Traffic engineering decisions should be evidence-based, not merely reactive. Pilot programs, accident-rate monitoring, and travel-time studies should determine whether a particular corridor truly benefits from counter-flow or whether signal optimization and better public transport would produce safer results.

Another behavioral concern must be considered: are motorists gradually being conditioned to think that counter-flow driving is acceptable everywhere? Strict enforcement and clear physical separation are necessary so drivers understand that reversible lanes are controlled systems—not an excuse for unauthorized counter-flowing.

In the end, counter-flow is neither inherently good nor inherently bad. It is a high-impact tool that delivers strong benefits when supported by science, technology, and disciplined enforcement, but it can become dangerous when implemented casually. The real issue is not whether we should allow counter-flow, but whether we are using the engineering data, technology, and institutional coordination required to make it safe.

RAMON IKE V. SENERES

www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com senseneres.blogspot.com 09088877282/03-25-2027

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES?

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES? When we talk about the crime rate in the Philippines, we often assume that the figures we see are accurate reflections of reality. But have we ever paused to ask—how exactly is the crime rate computed? Where does this data come from, and how reliable is it? The computation of the crime rate in the Philippines is officially handled by the Philippine National Police (PNP). The formula itself is straightforward: Crime Rate = (Total Reported Crimes / Total Population) x 100,000 This simple equation gives us the number of crimes per 100,000 people, allowing for fair comparison across regions and time periods. However, the reality behind these numbers is more complex than it appears. Data from the Ground The foundation of our national crime rate is empirical data collected at the grassroots level—from individual police stations scattered across the country. Every reported crime is logged in local police blotters, forming the buil...
Read more

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS Dear Mr. President: May I ask who is going to be the arbiter or referee whenever there are overlaps in functions between two or more government agencies? I imagine that there would be no problem if these agencies would just cooperate and collaborate with each other, but what if they are unable to settle their differences and they would just end up throwing blame at each other or finger pointing at each other? Allow me to cite some examples. Who is supposed to take the lead in waste to energy projects? Is it supposed to be the DENR that is supposed to handle waste? Or is it supposed to be the DOE that is supposed to handle energy generation? Or is it supposed to be the DILG since it is the one that could direct or influence the waste to energy projects of LGUs? Who is supposed to take the lead in producing and promoting the use of biofuels? Is it supposed to be the DA, since the production of biofuels is supposed to be all about planting biofuel ...
Read more

BATTLING A MENTAL HEALTH EPIDEMIC

BATTLING A MENTAL HEALTH EPIDEMIC It is already a well-established fact that the Covid-19 pandemic also triggered what could be called a mental health pandemic. It does not mean however that since the Covid-19 pandemic has practically slowed down, that the mental health pandemic has also slowed down. For the record, no one has officially declared the mental health problem is already a pandemic, but I suggest that we already make that declaration, so that we could respond to the problem with the attention that it needs. As far as I know, no one has declared that the Covid-19 pandemic is officially over, with most governments merely saying that it is now reduced to being a manageable epidemic, whatever that means. What is clear however, is that no one has also declared that the mental health pandemic is also over, in fact many governments would even hesitate to call it an epidemic. The fact remains however that globally, 1 out of 8 are affected according to the WHO, and locally, at least...
Read more