HOW CAN WE IMPROVE THE RE-INTEGRATION OF RETURNING OVERSEAS FILIPINO WORKERS?

HOW CAN WE IMPROVE THE RE-INTEGRATION OF RETURNING OVERSEAS FILIPINO WORKERS?

For decades, Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) have been our modern-day economic heroes. Their remittances—now consistently exceeding US$35 billion annually according to the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas—keep our economy afloat. But when they come home for good, are we truly ready for them?

As of 2026, the government, through the Department of Migrant Workers (DMW), has launched the National Reintegration Network (NRN), linking 16 agencies into one coordinated system. On paper, that sounds impressive. Yet many OFWs still complain: “Pag-uwi namin, parang wala ring malinaw na direksyon.”

So what is the real problem? Is the government not doing enough? Or is everything good on paper but weak in implementation? Or is it simply poor information dissemination?

Let me offer some thoughts.

First, skill recognition.
A project manager in Dubai or a specialized technician in Germany returns home only to be offered entry-level work. That is not reintegration—that is regression. We need a true equivalency system through Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) and Commission on Higher Education (CHED) that formally credits years of international experience. Senate Bill 1776 reportedly pushes for this, but legislation must move faster. Experience abroad should not be treated as a foreign curiosity; it should be treated as a national asset.

Second, digital one-stop systems.
Why must an OFW line up at multiple offices just to register a small business? If Singapore can do business registration online in minutes, why can’t we? Expanding a unified portal—covering DTI permits, BIR registration, and local clearances—would reduce the “red tape trauma” many returnees face. Secretary Hans Leo Cacdac’s “Red Carpet, Not Red Tape” slogan should be felt, not just heard.

Third, full-cycle financial reintegration.
Financial literacy should start before deployment. Every departing OFW should have a “return plan”—a target savings amount and a concrete investment strategy. Upon return, access to low-interest reintegration loans from Landbank or DBP must be realistic, not buried under impossible collateral requirements. Remittances should become capital, not consumption.

Fourth, specialized professional tracks.
The “Sa Pinas, Ikaw ang Ma’am at Sir” (SPIMS) program helps licensed teachers re-enter the public school system. Why not replicate this for nurses, engineers, or hospitality professionals? Imagine fast-track hiring for returning health workers in provincial hospitals, or engineers in infrastructure projects. Reintegration should be strategic, not accidental.

Fifth, psychosocial support.
We forget that reintegration is emotional. Reverse culture shock is real. Family relationships change. Barangay-level OFW Family Circles with access to counseling could prevent silent suffering. Economic support without emotional support is incomplete.

Now, about satisfaction ratings. The DMW uses Client Satisfaction Measurements, and reports often exceed 90% approval for frontline services. There is also a feedback loop under the NRN and longer-term monitoring through partnerships like the BRIDGE Programme with the International Organization for Migration. These track whether returnees are still employed or if their businesses survive after 6 to 12 months.

But here is my question: Are we measuring satisfaction at the counter—or success in real life?

Did the OFW find stable employment? Is the small business still operating after one year? Did family relationships improve? Those are the metrics that truly matter.

In fairness, I open this space to OFWs themselves. Tell us: What worked? What failed? To the agencies concerned: Share your data transparently. If satisfaction is truly above 90%, let us see the regional breakdowns. Let us hear the stories behind the numbers.

Reintegration is not charity. It is an economic strategy. If we can transform returning OFWs from remittance senders into local investors, entrepreneurs, and mentors, we will not just welcome them home—we will empower them to rebuild the nation.

The real question is not whether programs exist. The real question is: Are returning OFWs truly thriving?

RAMON IKE V. SENERES

www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com senseneres.blogspot.com 09088877282/04-20-2027

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES?

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES? When we talk about the crime rate in the Philippines, we often assume that the figures we see are accurate reflections of reality. But have we ever paused to ask—how exactly is the crime rate computed? Where does this data come from, and how reliable is it? The computation of the crime rate in the Philippines is officially handled by the Philippine National Police (PNP). The formula itself is straightforward: Crime Rate = (Total Reported Crimes / Total Population) x 100,000 This simple equation gives us the number of crimes per 100,000 people, allowing for fair comparison across regions and time periods. However, the reality behind these numbers is more complex than it appears. Data from the Ground The foundation of our national crime rate is empirical data collected at the grassroots level—from individual police stations scattered across the country. Every reported crime is logged in local police blotters, forming the buil...
Read more

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS Dear Mr. President: May I ask who is going to be the arbiter or referee whenever there are overlaps in functions between two or more government agencies? I imagine that there would be no problem if these agencies would just cooperate and collaborate with each other, but what if they are unable to settle their differences and they would just end up throwing blame at each other or finger pointing at each other? Allow me to cite some examples. Who is supposed to take the lead in waste to energy projects? Is it supposed to be the DENR that is supposed to handle waste? Or is it supposed to be the DOE that is supposed to handle energy generation? Or is it supposed to be the DILG since it is the one that could direct or influence the waste to energy projects of LGUs? Who is supposed to take the lead in producing and promoting the use of biofuels? Is it supposed to be the DA, since the production of biofuels is supposed to be all about planting biofuel ...
Read more

BATTLING A MENTAL HEALTH EPIDEMIC

BATTLING A MENTAL HEALTH EPIDEMIC It is already a well-established fact that the Covid-19 pandemic also triggered what could be called a mental health pandemic. It does not mean however that since the Covid-19 pandemic has practically slowed down, that the mental health pandemic has also slowed down. For the record, no one has officially declared the mental health problem is already a pandemic, but I suggest that we already make that declaration, so that we could respond to the problem with the attention that it needs. As far as I know, no one has declared that the Covid-19 pandemic is officially over, with most governments merely saying that it is now reduced to being a manageable epidemic, whatever that means. What is clear however, is that no one has also declared that the mental health pandemic is also over, in fact many governments would even hesitate to call it an epidemic. The fact remains however that globally, 1 out of 8 are affected according to the WHO, and locally, at least...
Read more