WHO AMONG US NEEDS PROTECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?

WHO AMONG US NEEDS PROTECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is like electricity in the early 1900s—full of promise, but also full of dangers for those who do not know how to handle it. For me, the priority groups needing protection are clear: minors and older adults. In the Philippines, we define minors as anyone below 18, and “older adults” as our senior citizens, those aged 60 and above. These two groups are often the least equipped to recognize the risks created by rapidly advancing AI tools.

And make no mistake: AI is already being used for harm.

The Rise of AI Scams

Scammers today are no longer satisfied with text messages or suspicious emails. With AI, they can now produce videos that look and sound like your own family members, claiming they’re in danger, asking for money urgently, or begging for help.

This is the era of deepfakes—videos so convincing that even tech-savvy adults sometimes pause. How much more for a 12-year-old child or a 72-year-old lola?

Most minors don’t have the critical thinking skills yet to question these videos. Most seniors, on the other hand, grew up in a time when seeing is believing.

Today, seeing is no longer believing.

Where Should Protection Come From?

I believe the government needs to take this threat as seriously as it takes natural disasters. Fraud, identity theft, and emotional manipulation are becoming digital hazards.

Here are the agencies that should lead the response:

  • DSWD and DICT – launch massive educational campaigns on AI scams, online safety, and responsible technology use.

  • NCSC – create targeted protection programs for senior citizens, including hotlines and “digital safety orientations” in barangay centers.

  • PCO, PIA, PNA – run sustained public information drives across radio, TV, print, and social media. (This cannot be a one-week campaign; it must be ongoing.)

Digital literacy is now a basic survival skill.

Are There NGOs Working on This?

Around the world, nonprofits are forming to address AI harms, but here in the Philippines, efforts remain scattered. Groups like Digital Rights Asia-Pacific and Foundation for Media Alternatives discuss digital rights and data privacy—but I have yet to find an NGO focused specifically on AI harm prevention for minors and seniors.

If such an organization exists, please let me know. I would be happy to coordinate with them. If none exists, perhaps it is time to start one.

Beyond Scams: Who Else Needs Protection?

While minors and seniors are the most vulnerable, other groups are at risk too:

  • Workers who may lose jobs due to automation.

  • Marginalized communities who suffer when AI systems are biased or inaccessible.

  • Consumers manipulated by AI-driven advertising or opaque algorithms.

  • Citizens exposed to deepfakes, misinformation, and political manipulation.

AI has infiltrated commerce, employment, education, and politics—faster than our laws can keep up.

The Bigger Picture: Protecting Our Dignity

Protection from AI is ultimately a matter of human dignity.

AI should empower, not exploit.
 AI should inform, not deceive.
 AI should strengthen democracy, not undermine it.

If we fail to protect society’s most vulnerable, AI may become a tool that widens inequality instead of uplifting communities.

My Question: Who will protect the barangays?

Barangays are the frontline of governance, yet they have zero preparation for AI harms. No training, no guidelines, no systems. If AI tools—both good and bad—are already reaching households, shouldn’t barangays have their own AI safety playbook?

Perhaps the time has come to create a Barangay AI Protection Framework—clear, simple, localized guidelines that protect residents while helping communities use AI safely and productively.

RAMON IKE V. SENERES

www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com senseneres.blogspot.com 09-17-2026

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES?

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES? When we talk about the crime rate in the Philippines, we often assume that the figures we see are accurate reflections of reality. But have we ever paused to ask—how exactly is the crime rate computed? Where does this data come from, and how reliable is it? The computation of the crime rate in the Philippines is officially handled by the Philippine National Police (PNP). The formula itself is straightforward: Crime Rate = (Total Reported Crimes / Total Population) x 100,000 This simple equation gives us the number of crimes per 100,000 people, allowing for fair comparison across regions and time periods. However, the reality behind these numbers is more complex than it appears. Data from the Ground The foundation of our national crime rate is empirical data collected at the grassroots level—from individual police stations scattered across the country. Every reported crime is logged in local police blotters, forming the buil...
Read more

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS Dear Mr. President: May I ask who is going to be the arbiter or referee whenever there are overlaps in functions between two or more government agencies? I imagine that there would be no problem if these agencies would just cooperate and collaborate with each other, but what if they are unable to settle their differences and they would just end up throwing blame at each other or finger pointing at each other? Allow me to cite some examples. Who is supposed to take the lead in waste to energy projects? Is it supposed to be the DENR that is supposed to handle waste? Or is it supposed to be the DOE that is supposed to handle energy generation? Or is it supposed to be the DILG since it is the one that could direct or influence the waste to energy projects of LGUs? Who is supposed to take the lead in producing and promoting the use of biofuels? Is it supposed to be the DA, since the production of biofuels is supposed to be all about planting biofuel ...
Read more

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES As it is supposed to be, anyone in the Philippines should be able to dial 911, and a telephone operator should be able to dispatch fire, rescue, ambulance and police (FRAP) units as soon as possible, based on acceptable response times. I invented the FRAP acronym for easy recall, and I hope it sticks, if there is no other alternative. Unfortunately, due to a mixture of technical and political reasons, the Philippines has not adopted 911 as a national number, because some LGUs would rather use their own three-digit numbers such as 117 and 168. I actually proposed a technical solution to that problem, but it was not adopted either. For whatever it is worth, my solution is to install a call forwarding system that could route all calls to a central operator, regardless of what number is dialed. It is very sad for me to know that up to now, even if our country is already over one hundred years old, there are still many LGUs that do not have fire trucks. it ...
Read more