WHAT ARE VANADIUM REDOX FLOW BATTERIES?

WHAT ARE VANADIUM REDOX FLOW BATTERIES?

Let’s get straight to it. If we are serious about transitioning to clean energy, and if we genuinely want reliable, long-duration storage (not just short bursts), then this question needs to be asked: Why isn’t the Vanadium Redox Flow Battery (VRFB) everywhere in the Philippines?

Because on paper, the benefits are clear. Because in practice, countless countries are already deploying them. And yet here at home, in the Philippines, we remain largely on the sidelines, waiting.

What is a VRFB?

A vanadium redox flow battery stores energy in liquid electrolytes containing vanadium ions, housed in large storage tanks. Two separate tanks (anolyte and catholyte) pump electrolyte through a stack of cells where redox reactions occur—charge/discharge. 

Key characteristics:

  • Energy storage (kWh) can scale by increasing tank volume; power (kW) by adding more cell stacks.

  • Lifespan measured in decades: 20+ years, thousands upon thousands of cycles.

  • Safety advantage: non-flammable aqueous electrolyte; minimal risk of thermal runaway.

In short: this is a battery built for stationary, grid-scale use—especially where renewable energy intermittency demands long-duration backup, not just quick bursts.

Why should we care in the Philippines?

Because our energy future won’t be built on coal alone. Because we will need storage that can absorb solar from midday and deliver into the evening, or hold wind energy for when the breeze dies. And because our archipelago geography means many remote grids and islands where reliability is critical.

Here are issues for our context:

  • Which government agency is responsible? Should the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) take the lead? Or the Department of Energy (DOE)? Or should it be a collaboration among them, perhaps with the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) and the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) exploring overseas partnerships?

  • Are we content to remain importers of the technology, or can we aim to locally assemble or even develop VRFBs (assuming we could import raw materials)?

  • Do we have local vanadium resources? Unlikely large-scale, but could there be potential for strategic raw material sourcing or recycling?

  • Should DTI or DFA already be contacting major VRFB manufacturers abroad (for technology transfer, investment, clusters)?

  • How does this align with our energy transition goals and the mandate for universal access and resilience in a country prone to typhoons and grid disruption?

In fact, the DOST is already doing something: The Technological Institute of the Philippines (TIP), under DOST funding, is working on a battery energy storage system with its Advanced Batteries Center. That’s promising—but the question remains: will flow-batteries (VRFBs) be part of that pipeline, or will we default to lithium-ion because everyone else uses that?

Why isn’t VRFB everywhere yet?

Let’s be realistic. For all the promise, there are clear hurdles:

  1. High upfront cost
     Vanadium electrolyte, large tanks, pumps and stacks: they cost more initially than many lithium-ion systems.

  2. Supply chain & material risk
     Vanadium is produced largely as a by-product of steel manufacturing in a few countries (notably China). That means supply volatility and geopolitical risk.

  3. Market inertia
     Lithium-ion batteries have scale, manufacturing lines, investment, precedent. VRFBs are less familiar to investors and utilities in many markets.

  4. Technical limitations
     Energy density is low compared to lithium-ion (~20–30 Wh/kg) making them unsuitable for mobile applications (EVs) or where space is tight. Also: to maintain electrolytes and manage temperature ranges requires care.

  5. Policy & incentive lag
     In many jurisdictions, incentives favour short-duration storage or lithium-ion systems. Long-duration technologies like VRFBs are just now getting policy attention.

It adds up to: the technology is excellent for certain use-cases (grid, renewables, long-duration) but doesn’t yet fit the mass-market narrative. Until it does, uptake remains moderate.

What can the Philippines do now?

Here are suggestions:

  • Create a national roadmap that explicitly recognises long-duration storage technologies (like VRFBs) in our renewable energy targets.

  • Assign coordinating responsibility: DOST (R&D), DOE (policy & infrastructure), DTI (industry and manufacturing) should collaborate. A “VRFB Consortium” could be formed to link universities, industry, and government agencies.

  • Catalyse pilot projects: Deploy one or two multi-MW VRFB installations in island-grids (e.g., Visayas or Mindanao micro-grids) to demonstrate benefits and build familiarity.

  • Encourage local manufacture/assembly: Even if we import core stacks, assembling local electrolyte tanks, piping, monitoring, maintenance might build a domestic industry.

  • Explore raw material strategy: While large-scale vanadium mining may not be realistic for now, recycling vanadium from used steel or co-products could be explored; monitor global supply chains.

  • Update procurement frameworks: Shift public tendering for storage systems away from “all energy storage is lithium-ion” to “suitable storage for duration, grid need, cost-life cycle”.

  • Promote public-private partnerships: Local businesses can sponsor pilot VRFBs as part of CSR/energy resilience programmes—especially industrial estates, eco-zones, resort islands.

So: what are vanadium redox flow batteries? They’re a genuine contender for the next phase of energy storage—especially when we stop thinking “battery = short-term” and start thinking “storage = resilience, multi-hour, decade-long service”. The technology is proven, safe, scalable, and long-lived.

But the question remains: why isn’t it everywhere yet? Because cost, supply chain, market familiarity and policy lag all stand in the way.

For the Philippines, this is both a challenge and an opportunity. We can either remain on the sidelines and import energy-storage solutions (again), or we can step up, set a national strategy, pilot the technology, and build local capacity. The alternative is that while others modernise their grids, we get stuck with yesterday’s lithium-ion solutions when we’ll need tomorrow’s long-duration capabilities.

If our energy future is to be resilient, decarbonised, and responsive—not only for Metro Manila but for every island and barangay—then VRFBs deserve a seat at the table. And we should ask ourselves: when will the Philippines stop watching and start implementing?

Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres

iseneres@yahoo.com, senseneres.blogspot.com 04-04-2026

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES?

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES? When we talk about the crime rate in the Philippines, we often assume that the figures we see are accurate reflections of reality. But have we ever paused to ask—how exactly is the crime rate computed? Where does this data come from, and how reliable is it? The computation of the crime rate in the Philippines is officially handled by the Philippine National Police (PNP). The formula itself is straightforward: Crime Rate = (Total Reported Crimes / Total Population) x 100,000 This simple equation gives us the number of crimes per 100,000 people, allowing for fair comparison across regions and time periods. However, the reality behind these numbers is more complex than it appears. Data from the Ground The foundation of our national crime rate is empirical data collected at the grassroots level—from individual police stations scattered across the country. Every reported crime is logged in local police blotters, forming the buil...
Read more

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS Dear Mr. President: May I ask who is going to be the arbiter or referee whenever there are overlaps in functions between two or more government agencies? I imagine that there would be no problem if these agencies would just cooperate and collaborate with each other, but what if they are unable to settle their differences and they would just end up throwing blame at each other or finger pointing at each other? Allow me to cite some examples. Who is supposed to take the lead in waste to energy projects? Is it supposed to be the DENR that is supposed to handle waste? Or is it supposed to be the DOE that is supposed to handle energy generation? Or is it supposed to be the DILG since it is the one that could direct or influence the waste to energy projects of LGUs? Who is supposed to take the lead in producing and promoting the use of biofuels? Is it supposed to be the DA, since the production of biofuels is supposed to be all about planting biofuel ...
Read more

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES As it is supposed to be, anyone in the Philippines should be able to dial 911, and a telephone operator should be able to dispatch fire, rescue, ambulance and police (FRAP) units as soon as possible, based on acceptable response times. I invented the FRAP acronym for easy recall, and I hope it sticks, if there is no other alternative. Unfortunately, due to a mixture of technical and political reasons, the Philippines has not adopted 911 as a national number, because some LGUs would rather use their own three-digit numbers such as 117 and 168. I actually proposed a technical solution to that problem, but it was not adopted either. For whatever it is worth, my solution is to install a call forwarding system that could route all calls to a central operator, regardless of what number is dialed. It is very sad for me to know that up to now, even if our country is already over one hundred years old, there are still many LGUs that do not have fire trucks. it ...
Read more