GASIFICATION AS AN ENERGY SOLUTION
GASIFICATION AS AN ENERGY SOLUTION
My former UP political science professor
Claire Carlos often reminds us through her Facebook posts that solutions to our
national problems sometimes lie in the “obvious but overlooked.” Energy is one
such problem. We worry about expensive electricity, blackouts, and imported
fuel. Yet, right under our noses, we have agricultural waste piling up in the
countryside. What if this “waste” is really energy waiting to be tapped?
James Erwin T. Gamit, in his thoughtful essay
on gasification, points out that this technology can turn rice husks, corn
cobs, coconut shells, and other residues into syngas—a usable fuel that can run
small power plants, generate electricity, or even be converted into chemicals
and liquid fuels. In short, what farmers usually burn in the open field or
throw away can light up a barangay.
But here comes the first big question: Are
there always enough feedstocks to sustain a barangay-based gasification system?
Rural barangays may have plenty after harvest season, but will supply be steady
all year round? Perhaps the answer is to combine technologies. Imagine a hybrid
barangay energy system: gasification for crop residues, solar for the daytime,
wind for coastal or highland areas, and biogas for manure and kitchen waste.
Each has strengths and weaknesses, but together, they form a resilient shield
against blackouts.
This leads us to another question worth
debating: Is it possible for rural communities to eventually declare energy
independence? Has it been done before? The answer is yes. In Germany, the
small village of Wildpoldsried now produces five times more energy than it
consumes—selling the surplus back to the national grid. In Alaska’s Kodiak
Island, nearly 100% of energy now comes from wind and hydro. In India, entire
villages have shifted to solar microgrids. If they can, why can’t our
barangays?
Of course, technology has its quirks. For
instance, can gasification use charcoal? The answer is also yes. In fact,
charcoal gasifiers can be more efficient because charcoal burns cleaner and
produces less tar. The catch is that making charcoal itself consumes energy and
releases emissions. But perhaps in our climate—where drying raw biomass during
rainy months is a problem—charcoal could serve as a seasonal backup fuel.
All of this points to a larger national
conversation. Should we not have a clear national goal for energy
independence, as other countries do? Right now, our Department of Energy
talks about electrifying every barangay by 2028, but electrification is not the
same as independence. If our power still comes from imported coal, diesel, or
even natural gas, then we still remain vulnerable to global shocks.
The Philippines should have a roadmap for
energy independence. Not just a slogan, but a detailed plan: how much
solar, how much wind, how many barangay-scale gasifiers, how much biogas, and
yes—whether nuclear will still be on the table. The roadmap must also answer
the hard question: How many years will it take before we can confidently say
we are energy independent? Ten years? Twenty? Or never, if we just muddle
along?
Which brings us to the most controversial
question: Can we avoid nuclear energy if we have a complete mix of hybrid
renewable solutions? Nuclear is powerful, but dangerous and politically
divisive. If our barangays can be energy self-reliant through a smart mix of
gasification, solar, wind, and biogas, maybe nuclear will no longer be
necessary. Or at least, we will have the luxury of choice.
I believe the road to Philippine energy
independence must start at the barangay. Local, community-owned systems reduce
dependency on big utilities and foreign fuel. They also create jobs for
farmers, carpenters, and technicians who can collect feedstocks, build, and
maintain the systems. Most of all, they give people the dignity of
self-reliance.
As Professor Carlos might say: sometimes the
answer is already in the hands of the people—quite literally, in the rice husks
they sweep from the floor after milling. The challenge is whether our leaders
can see this, and whether they are bold enough to give us not just power, but the
power to be free from foreign dependence.
Ramon Ike V. Seneres,
www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282,
senseneres.blogspot.com
Comments
Post a Comment