A CIRCULAR ECONOMY VERSUS A LINEAR ECONOMY
A CIRCULAR ECONOMY VERSUS A LINEAR ECONOMY
HOW can we
transition from a circular economy towards a linear economy? Wait a
minute—shouldn’t it be the other way around? Exactly. I asked the question that
way on purpose, because that is how most people are still living their
lives—inside a linear economy—without realizing that the real challenge is to
move out of it and into a circular one.
So, what is a
linear economy? I ask that because I want to better understand what a circular
economy is. In simple terms, the two are exact opposites. The linear economy
follows a very straightforward flow: take,
make, use, dispose. You extract resources, manufacture products,
consume them, and then throw them away. End of story.
It sounds simple
and efficient—but only in the short term. The linear model is
resource-intensive, waste-generating, and unsustainable. It thrives on
producing more, even if that means exhausting finite resources and filling
landfills with garbage. Clearly, this model is no longer viable if our goal is
long-term sustainability.
By contrast,
the circular economy is
regenerative. Instead of a dead-end disposal, it keeps materials in the
loop—reuse, repair, recycle, redesign. Waste is minimized, resources are
conserved, and products are built for durability. Sustainability is built into
the system itself.
The real
question now is: how do we get there?
Should we change our laws? Should we even go higher and amend our Constitution?
Perhaps not immediately. But very clearly, we need to change the way we do
business.
The most
practical place to start is with packaging. One-way packaging is the trademark
of a linear economy: plastics and sachets used once and then discarded. A
circular economy, on the other hand, designs packaging to be reused, refilled,
or recycled. That small shift alone would drastically reduce waste in our
cities.
Should laws be
changed? Yes, all the way down to the local level. Quezon City has already
banned one-way plastics. More cities should follow suit. But laws on paper are
not enough. Implementation and innovation must go hand in hand.
Here’s where
agencies like DEVDEP come in. They
should review local laws and recommend how circular practices can be embedded
across industries. DepEd, CHED, and TESDA
should integrate circular economy concepts into their curricula—so that young
people grow up with sustainability as second nature.
Congress, for
its part, can pass laws requiring two-way packaging, perhaps backed by
deposit-refund systems. Imagine buying a soda in a glass bottle and getting a
refund when you return it, as was common in the past. That is a simple circular
model we have already tried before—and abandoned too quickly in favor of
plastic convenience.
Local
governments should also embrace innovative solutions. Spurway Enterprises, for
example, is introducing Reverse Vending
Machines (RVMs)—machines that accept empty bottles or cans and give
consumers a reward, such as the models distributed by Spurway Enterprises. Such initiatives not only reduce waste but also create a
culture of accountability.
The government,
too, can reinforce positive behavior by giving awards to companies that adopt
circular packaging. Recognition, after all, is a powerful motivator in
business.
But let us not
leave it all to government. Communities and industries must move together.
Consider the textile industry. In a linear model, fast fashion clothes are worn
briefly and then dumped in landfills. In a circular model, textile scraps can
be reclaimed by artisans, rewoven into new products, and sold in local
markets—creating income while reducing waste.
This is where
barangay-level initiatives come in. Imagine artisans reusing discarded glass,
ceramics, and textiles. Imagine NGOs and schools teaching children not only how
to sort waste but also how to transform it into useful products. Imagine LGUs
providing space for micro-facilities where recycling and upcycling can happen.
That is community-based circular economy in action.
To be clear:
transitioning to a circular economy is not just about waste management. It is
about rethinking the entire system.
It is about moving from volume-based growth to value-based sustainability. It
is about designing for longevity, not obsolescence. It is about turning
consumers into co-creators of value.
The truth is,
we are still stuck in the linear mindset. But the longer we wait, the more
waste piles up, the more resources run dry, and the more vulnerable our economy
becomes to shocks. The circular economy is not just a nice idea. It is a
necessity.
So, my question
remains: how do we start? Perhaps by changing our mindset, then our business
practices, then our local ordinances, and eventually, our national policies.
Sustainability should no longer be an option. It should be the rule of the
game.
Ramon Ike V. Seneres,
www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com,
senseneres.blogspot.com
Comments
Post a Comment