TIME TO MAKE THE DISEASE CONTROL DATABASE THAT COULD SAVE LIVES
TIME TO MAKE THE DISEASE CONTROL DATABASE THAT COULD SAVE LIVES
You’d think that after enduring dengue, SARS,
bird flu, swine flu, and of course, COVID-19, we would have learned a thing or
two about being proactive with public
health. And yet, here we are in 2025—with no fully integrated national database
for disease control.
This reality
struck me during a lecture by Dr. Nelia P. Salazar on “Environment and
Disease,” hosted by the National Academy of Science and Technology. Dr. Salazar
explained that while the Philippines does have pockets
of health-related databases, these operate in silos. There's no integration, no
real-time coordination, and no central system to map and respond to disease
outbreaks efficiently. That’s the good news—we have data. The bad news? We’re
not using it wisely.
Even more
concerning: when I asked Dr. Salazar if we have a local equivalent of the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), her answer was a flat “no.”
Yes, we have the Research Institute for Tropical Medicine (RITM), but it
focuses mostly on training and research. There is an Office for Infectious
Disease Prevention and Control under the Department of Health (DOH), but its
scope is nowhere near the CDC's. In short, we’re flying blind.
Why does this matter? Because disease surveillance
saves lives. We already know,
thanks to researchers like Dr. Salazar, where many disease vectors—like
mosquitoes and rats—are concentrated. We know how outbreaks start, how they
spread, and even how to prevent them. What we don’t have is a centralized,
responsive system that pulls all this
information together and acts on it. That’s what the CDC does for America—and
that’s what we urgently need here.
So, what should
we do?
First, we must create a Philippine Center for Disease Control.
This will require new legislation, yes. But until that can be passed, we need a
stopgap: the DOH should immediately begin building an integrated disease
control database under its Management Information Services (MIS) department.
Second, let’s
not reinvent the wheel. The U.S. CDC already has proven systems and software
for disease tracking, prediction, and coordination. We should tap into that. I
suggest that the President instruct the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) to
coordinate with the Philippine Embassy in Washington, DC, and request help from
the U.S. State Department. A faster route? Contact the U.S. Embassy in Manila.
We’re not asking for charity—we’re asking for partnership in global health
security.
Yes, adapting
foreign systems will require customization. Our local realities—limited
internet in rural areas, barangay-level recordkeeping, language
differences—must be accounted for. But if we can get a functional base system, we can build on that. It’s faster and cheaper than starting from
scratch.
Now, I may not
be an epidemiologist, but I do know databases. I’ve led Management Information
Systems (MIS) Department at the DFA, the National Computer Center (NCC), the
National Computer Institute (NCI), and the PCSO. I know how to build systems
that work. More importantly, I know dozens of capable Filipino ICT
professionals—developers, analysts, network engineers—who would gladly volunteer their time to help set this
up. That’s how urgent and important this is.
This is no
longer about tech—it’s about national resilience. We’ve seen how a single virus
can grind economies to a halt, collapse healthcare systems, and destroy
families. Are we really going to wait for
another COVID to remind us of that?
Let’s also not
forget: data doesn’t just help us respond to outbreaks; it helps us prevent them. With an integrated system, we
could identify hotspots for dengue before they spike. We could forecast
water-borne diseases after floods. We could analyze respiratory illnesses in
real-time during smog events. In short, we could be smarter about public health.
And here’s
something else to chew on: the cost of setting up this system—hardware,
software, training, integration—will be minuscule
compared to what we’ll lose in the next pandemic if we don’t prepare now. Prevention is not only better than cure—it’s
cheaper too.
So, Mr.
President, the time to act is now. Build the system. Tap the experts. Seek
international support. And most importantly, empower a new agency that will exist not just to study
diseases, but to control them.
We cannot
afford to stay reactive. We must be predictive, preventive, and prepared.
If we fail to plan, we are planning to fail.
Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282,
senseneres.blogspot.com
08-30-2025
Comments
Post a Comment