RETHINKING AFFORESTATION: LET’S GROW NEW FORESTS, NOT JUST SINGLE TREES

RETHINKING AFFORESTATION: LET’S GROW NEW FORESTS, NOT JUST SINGLE TREES

After every typhoon, after every flood, and after every landslide, we’re reminded—again and again—that we need to plant more trees. And yet, we continue to act like this is a new discovery. It’s not. We’ve known it for decades. Trees slow down water runoff, hold the soil in place, and absorb carbon dioxide. But still, we fail to act at the scale required.

Let’s be honest: planting a few ceremonial seedlings here and there during “Earth Month” won’t solve our deforestation problem. We need to plant millions of trees, not just in denuded forests but in areas that were never forested before. This is where afforestation comes in—the planting of forests where there were none before.

For those who still confuse terms: reforestation is replanting trees in previously forested areas. Afforestation is planting new forests in places that have never been forests. Both are necessary. Both are urgent. Online sources say that afforestation can help deter climate change by absorbing carbon dioxide, preventing soil erosion, and enhancing biodiversity. In short, it’s not just about scenery or shade—it’s about survival.

Why Can’t We Do It?

That’s the question I keep asking myself—and now, I ask, is afforestation too much to ask from a nation that hasn’t even managed to do reforestation properly?

My answer, respectfully, is yes—but not for technical reasons. We have the science. We have the land. We have the manpower. What we lack is political will, and the kind of leadership that treats the environment not as an afterthought, but as a national priority.

The National Greening Program (NGP), for example, was launched with good intentions. But has it met its targets? Has it restored forest cover? Has anyone even been measuring its actual outcomes—not just seedlings distributed, but forests grown and sustained?

If not, then I suggest that it’s time to audit the NGP. Find out how much land has been reforested, and how much of that is still standing today. Let’s move from tree-planting events to tree-growing commitments.

Trees That Belong

Here’s another point that often gets overlooked: not all trees are created equal. We need to plant native species, not fast-growing invasive ones that destroy the natural biodiversity.

Let us all convince the DENR to prioritize native trees. At the same time, they should also identify and phase out invasive species that do more harm than good to our environment.

And while we’re on the subject, why don’t we make mangrove forests a bigger part of our reforestation agenda? Mangroves aren’t just trees; they’re natural barriers that protect our coastal communities from storm surges, flooding, and soil erosion.

Why isn’t mangrove afforestation front and center in our National Greening Program?

Learning from a Local Hero

Let me tell you a story: Gary Dabansol, a survivor of Super Typhoon Yolanda, planted 10,000 mangrove trees by himself in Matalom, Leyte. No budget. No government program. Just a man who understood what trees could do to protect his community.

If one man can do that, imagine what we could achieve if the entire government system supported people like Gary.

That brings me to my next point: Incentivize afforestation. What if tree-planting projects became eligible for carbon credit revenues? What if we could connect local efforts to debt-for-nature or debt-for-climate swap programs? Let’s make afforestation not just an environmental duty—but a viable livelihood opportunity.

Technology Can Help Us Grow

Monitoring forest growth is easier today than ever before. I propose that the government utilize drones and satellite imagery to verify what’s being planted, where it’s planted, and how much of it survives beyond the rainy season.

Set clear targets—how many square kilometers should be reforested or afforested per region per year. And then, track results visibly and transparently.

In Conclusion: Plant the Future

We Filipinos have a phrase: “Ang hindi marunong lumingon sa pinanggalingan ay hindi makakarating sa paroroonan.” Let’s extend that wisdom to our forests. If we forget the trees that once protected us, how can we expect protection from the storms yet to come?

The task is immense. But the opportunity is even greater. Afforestation is not a dream—it’s a strategy for disaster risk reduction, food security, biodiversity, and climate mitigation.

And above all, it’s a sign that we care not just about the present—but about the next generation.

Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com

08-17-2025

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES?

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES? When we talk about the crime rate in the Philippines, we often assume that the figures we see are accurate reflections of reality. But have we ever paused to ask—how exactly is the crime rate computed? Where does this data come from, and how reliable is it? The computation of the crime rate in the Philippines is officially handled by the Philippine National Police (PNP). The formula itself is straightforward: Crime Rate = (Total Reported Crimes / Total Population) x 100,000 This simple equation gives us the number of crimes per 100,000 people, allowing for fair comparison across regions and time periods. However, the reality behind these numbers is more complex than it appears. Data from the Ground The foundation of our national crime rate is empirical data collected at the grassroots level—from individual police stations scattered across the country. Every reported crime is logged in local police blotters, forming the buil...
Read more

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS Dear Mr. President: May I ask who is going to be the arbiter or referee whenever there are overlaps in functions between two or more government agencies? I imagine that there would be no problem if these agencies would just cooperate and collaborate with each other, but what if they are unable to settle their differences and they would just end up throwing blame at each other or finger pointing at each other? Allow me to cite some examples. Who is supposed to take the lead in waste to energy projects? Is it supposed to be the DENR that is supposed to handle waste? Or is it supposed to be the DOE that is supposed to handle energy generation? Or is it supposed to be the DILG since it is the one that could direct or influence the waste to energy projects of LGUs? Who is supposed to take the lead in producing and promoting the use of biofuels? Is it supposed to be the DA, since the production of biofuels is supposed to be all about planting biofuel ...
Read more

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES As it is supposed to be, anyone in the Philippines should be able to dial 911, and a telephone operator should be able to dispatch fire, rescue, ambulance and police (FRAP) units as soon as possible, based on acceptable response times. I invented the FRAP acronym for easy recall, and I hope it sticks, if there is no other alternative. Unfortunately, due to a mixture of technical and political reasons, the Philippines has not adopted 911 as a national number, because some LGUs would rather use their own three-digit numbers such as 117 and 168. I actually proposed a technical solution to that problem, but it was not adopted either. For whatever it is worth, my solution is to install a call forwarding system that could route all calls to a central operator, regardless of what number is dialed. It is very sad for me to know that up to now, even if our country is already over one hundred years old, there are still many LGUs that do not have fire trucks. it ...
Read more