PROPOSING A CABINET CLUSTER FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
PROPOSING A CABINET CLUSTER FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
Fifteen years ago, I wrote about the urgent
need to integrate basic human needs into a cohesive development framework. With
the UNIDA model (Universal, Needs-based, Integrated Development Approach), I
had proposed a roadmap for national progress that centered on health,
education, livelihood, peace and order, and justice. That vision is more
relevant than ever in 2025—and it’s time to give it institutional muscle.
Fast forward to today, I now propose the creation
of a new Cabinet Cluster for Sustainable Communities under the present Marcos
administration. While there may be existing clusters for infrastructure, human
development, climate change, and digital transformation that tackle these other
sectors, none of them are able to bridge the grassroots interconnectivity
of everyday community life. This new cluster would fill that gap.
Why a new
cluster?
Because our communities continue to face
fragmented, siloed approaches to development. Every city and town—collectively,
municipalities—is mandated to create a Municipal Development Plan
(MDP) through its Municipal Development Council (MDC). In theory,
these MDPs should be grassroots driven, reflecting the inputs from barangays.
In practice, however, this rarely happens.
One reason is capacity. Many local governments
lack the material and technical resources to consolidate a meaningful plan. The
solution? Public-private partnerships (PPP). But for PPPs to work, all
sectors—especially NGOs and civic organizations—must work within a shared
framework like UNIDA.
Even with over 1,600 municipalities in the
Philippines, it’s still realistic to assign at least one NGO to assist
each MDC, using UNIDA as a guide. These NGOs can form Technical Working
Groups (TWGs) focused on four core areas: health, education, livelihood,
and public safety. These are not just sectors—they are the very pillars of
sustainable communities.
Who leads
what?
Let’s clarify agency roles. The Department
of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) clearly oversees public safety,
via the PNP, BFP, and BJMP. But public safety is broader than law enforcement.
It intersects with climate resilience, disaster risk reduction, and even the
delivery of justice. Public safety also affects people’s access to shelters,
transport, and daily livelihoods.
As for livelihood, it’s a gray area. Is
it employment? Is it entrepreneurship? Both, in fact. Self-employment and
microenterprises are central to livelihood. That’s why the Department of
Finance (DOF)—through the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)
and other financing bodies—must take a more central role, especially in tracking
local financing needs. They have the tools; they just need a clearer
mandate.
We also need to revisit how we measure
public safety. Currently, the PNP reports crime statistics, but this
creates potential conflicts of interest. We need independent monitoring
systems for accurate data, perhaps through the Philippine Statistics
Authority (PSA) or a dedicated Public Safety Data Board.
And then there’s justice. The DILG plays a
role in two of the five pillars of justice—arrest (accusation) and
penology (transformation). But without strong linkages to the DOJ, the courts,
and parole agencies, the full justice chain remains broken at the community
level.
Human
resource clarity
When we say, "delivery of basic
services," we must identify not just the sectors, but who and where.
For health, it’s doctors and hospitals. For education, teachers and schools.
Clear enough.
But what about livelihood? Who is at the
core—trainers, coop leaders, microfinance officers? And what’s the delivery
point—livelihood centers, cooperatives, barangay hubs?
The same confusion exists in public safety.
Are our frontline workers the police, the firefighters, or barangay tanods?
Are we building safety around police stations, community centers, or schools?
Making the
Cluster Work
The Cabinet Cluster for Sustainable
Communities would harmonize all these elements. It would bring together the
DOH, DepEd, DILG, DOF, DOJ, DSWD, and even the Department of Human Settlements
and Urban Development (DHSUD)—plus representatives from the LGUs, private
sector, and civil society. The goal: to create a fully integrated
municipal-level development system, guided by shared goals, measurable
outcomes, and community-driven data.
Let’s stop treating “livelihood” as a side
issue. Let’s stop treating “public safety” as just police work. And let’s start
treating communities not as recipients of programs—but as architects of their
own progress.
Mr. President, this is an opportunity to
create a legacy that goes beyond infrastructure and into the heart of human
development. This is the time to build resilient, self-sustaining, and
empowered communities—with the structure, data, and leadership to back them
up.
Let’s bring the pieces together. Let’s cluster
for sustainability.
Ramon Ike V. Seneres,
www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282,
senseneres.blogspot.com
09-01-2025
Comments
Post a Comment