OTHER SOLUTIONS TO THE METRO TRAFFIC PROBLEM
OTHER SOLUTIONS TO THE METRO TRAFFIC PROBLEM
Metro Manila’s
traffic congestion is no longer just an inconvenience—it has become a
full-blown crisis with severe economic, environmental, and public health
consequences. The Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) estimates that
the country loses billions of pesos daily due to lost productivity, wasted
fuel, and time stuck in traffic. While infrastructure projects such as subways
and expressways are often touted as long-term solutions, we must also explore
other, less costly and more immediate strategies. Beyond building new roads, we
need to rethink policies, behaviors, and enforcement systems. Here are four
alternative and complementary solutions that can help mitigate the traffic
problem in Metro Manila.
1. Stricter Enforcement of Emissions Laws
One underrated
but highly impactful approach is the strict enforcement of vehicle emissions
regulations. A significant portion of vehicles clogging Metro Manila’s roads
are old, poorly maintained, and are smoke-belching. Not only do they contribute
to air pollution—exacerbating respiratory illnesses and harming vulnerable
populations—but their deteriorating condition also makes them more prone to
breakdowns, which cause further traffic delays. Enforcing emission laws more
rigorously, including random roadside checks and annual inspections, would
reduce the number of unroadworthy vehicles and encourage motorists to maintain
their vehicles properly or retire them altogether. This policy simultaneously
addresses both traffic and public health concerns.
2. Database of Traffic Violators
Technology can
play a vital role in enforcing discipline on our roads. A centralized,
nationwide database of traffic law violators—linked to their license number and
vehicle registration—would help ensure accountability. Through this database,
drivers with multiple offenses can face escalated penalties, including license
suspension or revocation. The current lack of coordination among enforcement
agencies leads to inefficiencies and allows habitual violators to slip through
the cracks. Integrating this database with a point system and publicly
available records could deter bad behavior and promote more responsible
driving.
3. Stricter Driver’s License Issuance
At present, the
standards for acquiring a driver’s license in the Philippines remain relatively
lax. Too many unqualified individuals—some of whom may not even understand
traffic signs or defensive driving practices—are given licenses. This
contributes to erratic, undisciplined, and unsafe driving, which in turn causes
accidents and gridlocks. The Land Transportation Office (LTO) should raise the
bar by improving both the theoretical and practical tests, instituting
psychological assessments, and requiring mandatory training through accredited
driving schools. Quality, not quantity, must be the priority.
4. Higher Insurance Premiums for Errant Drivers
Just as in
other countries, insurance rates in the Philippines should reflect driver
behavior. Motorists who have been involved in accidents or have multiple
violations should be charged higher premiums. This will serve as a financial
disincentive for careless or reckless driving. On the flip side, law-abiding
drivers should be rewarded with lower premiums. Insurance companies, in
partnership with government traffic agencies, can implement this system to help
influence behavior through market-based mechanisms.
In conclusion,
solving Metro Manila’s traffic problem requires a multifaceted approach that
goes beyond physical infrastructure. Discipline, accountability, and
enforcement are critical pillars of effective traffic management. These
complementary solutions, if executed properly, can bring about real and
measurable change in our daily commuting lives—making our cities safer,
cleaner, and more efficient for everyone.
Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com
06-28-2025
Comments
Post a Comment