LET COMELEC CLAIM THE SUCCESSFUL ELECTION AS A WIN
LET COMELEC CLAIM THE SUCCESSFUL ELECTION AS A WIN
In any democracy,
the integrity and efficiency of elections are cornerstones of public trust. In
the Philippines, the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) has long been both
praised and criticized for its role in administering national and local polls.
As someone who has closely followed the agency over the years—both as a critic
and a collaborator—I believe it is only fair, and timely, to acknowledge when
the Commission gets things right. The successful handling of the most recent
election under Chairman George Garcia deserves recognition. Let COMELEC claim
it as a win.
My relationship
with the Commission has spanned decades. I have served twice as Chairman of the
COMELEC Modernization Committee, once appointed jointly by both the Senate and
the Commission itself. In the past, I have not hesitated to raise technical concerns
about election automation, particularly regarding connectivity, data
transmission reliability, and vote counting accuracy. I did so not out of
antagonism, but out of a genuine desire to see a transparent, accountable
electoral process that the public could believe in. For many years, these
concerns dominated the public discourse, as electoral controversies eroded
confidence in the system.
However, in the
most recent election, it appears that COMELEC has finally turned a corner.
Under the leadership of Chairman Garcia, the Commission managed to administer a
largely smooth, peaceful, and efficient electoral exercise. While no election
is perfect and a few technical issues did emerge—as is expected in any complex,
nationwide operation—they did not rise to the level of systemic failure or
widespread disenfranchisement. In fact, the transmission speed and vote
canvassing were notably faster than in previous elections. More importantly,
these improvements were achieved without major allegations of fraud or
manipulation.
This success
should not be brushed aside or minimized. In an age of increasing cynicism
toward institutions, it is vital to acknowledge when a public agency fulfills
its mandate with professionalism and competence. Doing so encourages continued
improvement and sends a strong message to voters: that their participation
matters and that the system is working to protect their voice.
It is also time
to move forward. The temptation to dwell endlessly on past controversies must
be balanced with a constructive mindset that builds on institutional progress.
While oversight and accountability remain essential, they must not become tools
for undermining the very institutions we seek to strengthen. The COMELEC, like
any government body, must be subject to criticism—but also worthy of praise
when it earns it.
Letting COMELEC
claim this success as a win is not about glossing over past missteps or
ignoring areas that still need attention. It is about recognizing that
democratic institutions are capable of reform and growth. The Commission's
achievement in the last election is proof of that. Now, with renewed public
confidence, we can set our sights on more inclusive, transparent, and
tech-enabled elections in the future.
In conclusion,
this recent electoral success is not just a win for COMELEC—it is a win for
democracy. Let us acknowledge it, build on it, and move forward with a
stronger, more resilient electoral system.
Ramon
Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com,
09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com
06-14-2025
Comments
Post a Comment