ERADICATING INVASIVE FISH SPECIES: CAN WE EAT THE PROBLEM AWAY?
ERADICATING INVASIVE FISH SPECIES: CAN WE EAT THE PROBLEM AWAY?
Some of the most destructive creatures in Philippine waters didn’t evolve
here. They were introduced. And over time, they’ve quietly taken over, wiping
out native species and upsetting aquatic ecosystems. The invaders? Not pirates.
Not foreign fishing fleets. But fish.
Let’s name names: Clown Knifefish, Eastern Mosquitofish, Thai Catfish,
African Catfish, Rice Paddy Eel, Janitor Fish, and all varieties of Tilapia.
Yes, even Tilapia. Though it’s a household staple on many Filipino tables, every
single Tilapia in this country is invasive. Not one is native—and yet, most
Filipinos assume otherwise.
Meanwhile, our native Hito (Clarias macrocephalus) is quietly
losing ground to the African and Thai cousins. Our native Dalag, Ayungin,
and Biya are being outcompeted in their own home waters. How did we
let this happen?
Understanding the Invasion
Let’s not overcomplicate it. Invasive species are simply outsiders
that do damage. According to Copilot’s helpful summary, they harm
ecosystems by preying on native species, competing for food and space,
spreading diseases, and fundamentally altering aquatic habitats.
They’re like bullies in a school playground where the teacher never steps
in. And worse, since they have no natural predators, they multiply unchecked,
crowding out everything else. You’ll often hear the ecological term
“biodiversity loss.” This is what it looks like.
So, What’s the Government Doing?
Apparently, we have something called the National Invasive Species
Strategy and Action Plan (NISSAP), led by the DENR’s Biodiversity
Management Bureau (BMB). But what have they done lately?
Good question.
NISSAP’s stated goals are sound: identify invasive species, screen new
ones, and implement management strategies. But from where I sit—and from what
little is accessible online—the implementation seems vague and limited in
scope, especially if it only covers lakes. What about rivers, estuaries,
or even floodplains?
Our problems are not only floating in lakes—they’re swimming all over the
country.
Between Economy and Ecology
Here’s the dilemma: Tilapia is invasive, yes—but it’s also a
major livelihood source. Thousands of families depend on it for food and
income. That said, its spread may be hurting Milkfish (Bangus)
growers, who now face intense competition in local lakes.
Which one contributes more to the economy? Which one is more sustainable
in the long run? Should we keep Tilapia in enclosed fishponds only and protect
native habitats from further invasion?
This is not just a science issue—it’s also economic policy. We need a
serious cost-benefit analysis—a proper econometric study that weighs the
impact of eradicating versus regulating Tilapia and other invasive
species. I strongly suggest a multi-agency think tank to handle this.
Bring together DENR-BMB, BFAR, DOST, and even NEDA and DTI.
Can We Eat the Problem?
Interestingly, some invasive fish are edible. Take the Clown
Knifefish. It’s aggressive, but tasty. Could we follow the logic of “if you
can’t beat it, eat it”? Maybe. A national “Knifefish Fiesta,” perhaps? Joking
aside, this is serious: if the public learns to consume these species, we can
create a market-driven solution to a biological problem.
Unfortunately, not all invaders are that appetizing. Janitor Fish,
for example, are notoriously unpalatable. But must they go to waste?
This is where innovation must enter. Why not ask DOST and DTI to
develop alternative uses for Janitor Fish? Think: pet food, fish meal,
organic fertilizers, or even bioplastics. Why stop there? Give LGUs and
entrepreneurs incentives to harvest and convert these pests into profit.
Protecting What’s Ours
While we talk about fighting invasive fish, we must not forget the native
species we’re trying to protect. Many of them are on the brink—once
common, now rare. If other countries have succeeded in reviving endangered
flora and fauna, why not us?
But it’s not just about biology. It’s about heritage and food security.
We need to remember that our waters once teemed with diversity—each fish
species with a role, a purpose, a place. Our grandparents fished Dalag, Bia,
Paitan, and Ayungin—not because they were gourmet, but because
they were abundant and nutritious.
Let’s make sure our grandchildren get that same chance.
A Call to Action
This problem needs political will. We can’t leave it to researchers
alone. We need policy, programs, and public engagement. From national
funding to barangay-level action, from academic research to local fisherfolk
cooperatives.
The invasive species crisis is not just an environmental issue. It is a
test of governance. Are we managing our natural resources—or letting them
be overrun?
We already know what the problem is. The next question is: do we act
now, or wait until our last native fish disappears?
Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282,
senseneres.blogspot.com
08-19-2025
Comments
Post a Comment