A NEW HOPE FOR INDIGENOUS CULTURAL PEOPLES
A NEW HOPE FOR INDIGENOUS CULTURAL PEOPLES
I do not know exactly who first proposed the idea to move the National
Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) from the Department of Social
Welfare and Development (DSWD) to the Office of the President (OP)—but
whoever it was, I salute you. And to President Marcos Jr., I must say: that
was an excellent decision.
Why? Because under the DSWD, the NCIP was unintentionally being framed as
some sort of charity case. It’s not. Indigenous Cultural Peoples (ICPs) do
not need pity; they need partnerships, empowerment, and access to
government services. And now, under the Office of the President, the NCIP gains
bureaucratic muscle and the attention it deserves.
This shift presents a golden opportunity—a chance to reimagine the
NCIP not as a welfare agency, but as a full-fledged development agency,
capable of driving change in some of the most underserved regions of the
country.
Let’s look at the problems—and more importantly, the solutions.
1. The Elusive Ancestral Domain Titles
Can you believe that even after more than two decades since the Indigenous
People’s Rights Act (IPRA) was passed in 1997, many tribal communities
still haven’t been issued their Certificates of Ancestral Domain Titles
(CADTs)?
Why? The reasons vary—lack of funding, lack of lawyers, lack of political
will. But regardless of the excuse, the NCIP is supposed to have the
capacity to facilitate this. If the Commission is unable to issue CADTs
efficiently, then how can we talk about protecting indigenous lands and rights?
This is where I believe the Department of Justice (DOJ) should
step in. Under the direction of the President, the DOJ can mobilize legal
teams to help speed up the CADT process. There’s no reason why bureaucracy
should delay justice and recognition.
2. Undermined Representation
Another pressing concern: the role of Indigenous Peoples Mandatory
Representatives (IPMRs) in local government. The law is clear—ICPs have the
right to select their own representatives in municipal councils, city halls,
and provincial boards.
Yet in practice, some local mayors and governors are handpicking IPMRs
themselves. That’s not only undemocratic—it’s unconstitutional. If tribal
communities can’t choose who speaks for them, what kind of representation is
that?
Mr. President, I believe it is time to issue a firm executive
directive reminding LGUs that the right to self-representation is non-negotiable
under the IPRA law.
3. Basic Services Still Out of Reach
Let’s talk about distance. Many indigenous communities live in remote,
mountainous, or forested areas. That’s part of their cultural identity—and
part of the challenge. Because of geography, they are often excluded from
basic services like health care, education, and infrastructure.
We say “no one left behind” but many ICPs still feel exactly that—left
behind.
Yes, we have the Indigenous Peoples Education (IPED) program,
meant to deliver culturally responsive education. But why is implementation
moving so slowly? How many ICP schools are still without proper buildings,
teachers, or learning materials?
We need mobile clinics, satellite schools, digital classrooms, and
trained local health workers. If we can set up barangay health centers in urban
slums, why can’t we do the same in our ancestral domains?
4. From Surviving to Thriving:
Economic Empowerment
Most tribal communities are sitting on vast tracts of undeveloped land.
If properly supported, these areas could become productive agricultural
zones, agroforests, or eco-tourism hubs. Yet very few ITPs receive support
for training, financing, or marketing.
Many want to farm. Many can raise poultry or livestock. But they need the
means—not just to survive, but to build generational wealth.
Now that NCIP is under MalacaƱang, the President has a rare chance to
mobilize all the necessary government agencies, including:
- DOJ – Legal
support for fast-tracking CADT applications
- DOST – To identify
appropriate technologies for food, fiber, and energy
- DA – To provide
seeds, livestock, and technical training
- DOF – To channel
loans, grants, or subsidies to tribal enterprises
- DTI – To link
tribal products with mainstream markets and export channels
With the right coordination, tribal communities can be producers, not
dependents.
A Final Thought
This is not just about land titles or representation. This is about dignity,
about giving ICPs the chance to define their own future.
Let’s make it clear: ICPs are not problems to be solved. They are partners
in nation-building. Their knowledge, resilience, and relationship with
nature are invaluable assets in today’s climate and development struggles.
Now that the NCIP has a stronger voice, let’s make sure it’s heard—not
just in the halls of power, but in every sitio, barangay, and ancestral
mountain where our tribal brothers and sisters live.
Let this transfer not just be a change in bureaucracy—but the beginning
of a true transformation.
Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282,
senseneres.blogspot.com
08-16-2025
Comments
Post a Comment