ROAD RAGE AND GUN LAWS

ROAD RAGE AND GUN LAWS

There’s something about being behind the wheel that seems to unlock the worst in some people. Add a weapon into the mix, and you’ve got a dangerous cocktail of stress, entitlement, and rage. The intersection of road rage and gun laws is not just a matter of policy—it’s a matter of life and death.

Studies consistently show that humans are more prone to aggression when they are in possession of a firearm than when they are unarmed. It's not hard to see why. Firearms, even when holstered, instill a sense of power. At the very least, they give their carriers an added layer of confidence—perhaps even false courage. And when that confidence meets a moment of anger, the result can be tragic.

But let’s be clear: it doesn’t have to be a gun. Road rage can turn lethal with something as mundane as a baseball bat, a golf club, or a hammer. These items can easily be kept in a car under the convenient excuse of being a sportsman or a handyman. “I just came from practice,” or “I have a house repair to do” are all-too-easy justifications.

In fairness, most people who keep such items in their vehicles likely do so for self-defense, not with the intent to attack. But rage is rage—and anger is the fuel that sets it ablaze. Whether it's road rage or any other type of confrontation, the impulse to lash out often happens in a split second. And that’s the problem: many of the people who fire a gun in a moment of fury didn’t plan to. They just snapped.

This brings us to the laws surrounding firearm ownership and carrying rights in the Philippines. Many don't realize that having a License to Own and Possess Firearms (LTOPF) is not the same as having a Permit to Carry Firearms Outside of Residence (PTCFOR). The former allows one to legally own a firearm and keep it at home. The latter allows one to bring it outside. That’s a crucial distinction.

Some might argue, “But isn’t my car an extension of my home?” While that legal fiction may exist in other countries, it does not apply here. The law is explicit: unless you have a PTCFOR, transporting a firearm in your car is illegal. Exceptions are made for on-duty law enforcement officers and military personnel, but civilians must comply strictly with these rules.

And this is where the real issue lies—not in the right to own firearms, which the law already allows, but in the ability to carry them beyond one’s residence. Should we be allowing civilians to carry deadly weapons on the streets at all?

So, what should we do?

One solution is to be stricter in the issuance of the PTCFOR. Make it harder to get. Demand more accountability. Another, more controversial solution is to prohibit the carrying of firearms outside residences altogether for civilians. It's a hard pill to swallow, but maybe it's time we think about it seriously.

Now, to be very clear: I am not advocating for a gun ban. Responsible citizens who qualify should still be allowed to own firearms through the LTOPF system. What I am proposing is a congressional review of the legal basis for the PTCFOR. Let lawmakers debate this. Let them weigh public safety against personal defense. Let’s find out if the privilege of carrying firearms outside the home still serves the common good.

Meanwhile, what do we do about the road rage problem itself?

Should we require psychological evaluations for all drivers renewing their licenses? Should anger management programs be mandatory for those caught in road rage incidents? Should road rage be considered a moving violation that affects a driver’s insurance premiums?

These aren’t just rhetorical questions—they’re policy ideas that deserve serious consideration.

I suggest that the government commission a dedicated Technical Working Group (TWG) to study this issue. Let it be composed of experts from the Department of Transportation (DOTr), Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA), Department of Health (DOH), the UP National Center for Transportation Studies (NCTS), the Department of Science and Technology (DOST), and the Philippine Mental Health Association (PMHA). Road rage is not just a traffic problem—it’s a public health and safety issue.

At the end of the day, this is about keeping our streets safer—for our families, our children, and ourselves. Guns and cars don’t mix well, especially when tempers flare. Let’s stop pretending otherwise.

Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres

iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com

05-30-2025Top of Form

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES?

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES? When we talk about the crime rate in the Philippines, we often assume that the figures we see are accurate reflections of reality. But have we ever paused to ask—how exactly is the crime rate computed? Where does this data come from, and how reliable is it? The computation of the crime rate in the Philippines is officially handled by the Philippine National Police (PNP). The formula itself is straightforward: Crime Rate = (Total Reported Crimes / Total Population) x 100,000 This simple equation gives us the number of crimes per 100,000 people, allowing for fair comparison across regions and time periods. However, the reality behind these numbers is more complex than it appears. Data from the Ground The foundation of our national crime rate is empirical data collected at the grassroots level—from individual police stations scattered across the country. Every reported crime is logged in local police blotters, forming the buil...
Read more

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS Dear Mr. President: May I ask who is going to be the arbiter or referee whenever there are overlaps in functions between two or more government agencies? I imagine that there would be no problem if these agencies would just cooperate and collaborate with each other, but what if they are unable to settle their differences and they would just end up throwing blame at each other or finger pointing at each other? Allow me to cite some examples. Who is supposed to take the lead in waste to energy projects? Is it supposed to be the DENR that is supposed to handle waste? Or is it supposed to be the DOE that is supposed to handle energy generation? Or is it supposed to be the DILG since it is the one that could direct or influence the waste to energy projects of LGUs? Who is supposed to take the lead in producing and promoting the use of biofuels? Is it supposed to be the DA, since the production of biofuels is supposed to be all about planting biofuel ...
Read more

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES As it is supposed to be, anyone in the Philippines should be able to dial 911, and a telephone operator should be able to dispatch fire, rescue, ambulance and police (FRAP) units as soon as possible, based on acceptable response times. I invented the FRAP acronym for easy recall, and I hope it sticks, if there is no other alternative. Unfortunately, due to a mixture of technical and political reasons, the Philippines has not adopted 911 as a national number, because some LGUs would rather use their own three-digit numbers such as 117 and 168. I actually proposed a technical solution to that problem, but it was not adopted either. For whatever it is worth, my solution is to install a call forwarding system that could route all calls to a central operator, regardless of what number is dialed. It is very sad for me to know that up to now, even if our country is already over one hundred years old, there are still many LGUs that do not have fire trucks. it ...
Read more