POVERTY ALLEVIATION VERSUS POVERTY REDUCTION: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?
POVERTY ALLEVIATION VERSUS POVERTY REDUCTION: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?
Since I could not find any documents that
officially differentiate poverty alleviation from poverty reduction, please
allow me to offer my own differentiation as I see it.
Sad to say, there are some government
officials who do not appreciate the difference between the two. As for me,
poverty alleviation is like a band-aid solution or a painkiller—it provides
temporary relief but does not remove a person from the poverty line. On the
other hand, poverty reduction is like a surgical operation that removes the
tumor or cancer—it effectively lifts a person out of the poverty line.
In other words, poverty alleviation programs
help ease the pain of poverty among the poor, but they do not enable them to
rise above the poverty line. To a limited extent, I agree that improving the
delivery of public services can help people save money and ease the burden of
poverty, but it still does not free them from it.
The traditional method of measuring poverty
is through household income. The test is to compute whether a household can
afford to buy everything inside an “imaginary basket of goods” using their
total earnings. If they cannot afford to buy everything in the basket, they are
considered poor because they have “fallen” below the poverty line.
An alternative approach is the
Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), a new metric that measures whether a
household has access to health services, educational services, and certain
standards of living. Under the MPI method, “not having access” is the same as
“being deprived.”
The MPI method measures the outcome of having
or not having access. For example:
· Not having access to health services could mean a very
high mortality rate as an outcome.
· Not having access to educational services could mean a
very high illiteracy rate as an outcome.
· Not having access to certain basic services could mean
having a very low standard of living as an outcome.
Is it possible for a mayor to introduce
poverty reduction programs? Yes, if it means reducing the poverty rate. There
are only two ways to reduce the poverty rate: one is to reduce the unemployment
rate, and the other is to increase the number of small and medium enterprises
(SMEs). Both can be achieved through livelihood programs sponsored by Local
Government Units (LGUs).
Food distribution programs and medical
missions are good measures to support poverty alleviation, but what we truly
need are livelihood programs that enable people to earn more income and be
liberated from the poverty line.
Understanding Poverty Alleviation and
Poverty Reduction
Poverty alleviation refers to efforts and
strategies aimed at reducing economic hardships and improving the quality of
life for people experiencing poverty. These efforts can take various forms,
including:
· Economic Development: Creating jobs, supporting entrepreneurship, and
fostering economic growth in underdeveloped areas.
· Social Services: Providing access to essential services like healthcare, education,
housing, and clean water.
· Empowerment Programs: Supporting marginalized groups through skills
training, access to credit, and livelihood programs.
The goal is not just to increase income
levels but also to ensure that individuals and communities can live with
dignity and access opportunities for sustainable improvement.
Poverty reduction, on the other hand, is a
broader concept focused on implementing strategies and policies that decrease
poverty levels in a community, country, or globally. It involves creating
conditions where individuals and families can rise above the poverty line and
access sustainable resources and opportunities.
The Future of Poverty Reduction in
the Philippines
The Philippines has seen several notable
poverty reduction initiatives that have made a significant impact:
1.
Pantawid
Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps):
This program has helped millions of Filipino families improve access to
education, healthcare, and nutrition.
2.
Sustainable
Livelihood Program (SLP):
Launched in 2011, this program has provided employment opportunities and
supported vulnerable households in transitioning to sustainable livelihoods.
3.
KALAHI-CIDSS: This community-driven development program empowers
local communities to identify and implement projects that address poverty and
improve living conditions.
These initiatives highlight the importance of
combining government efforts, community participation, and international
support to achieve meaningful poverty reduction. What we need is not just
short-term poverty alleviation but long-term, sustainable poverty reduction
that empowers individuals and communities to thrive beyond the poverty line.
But the challenge remains: will our leaders
and policymakers focus more on poverty alleviation or shift toward true poverty
reduction? The answer to this question will determine the future of millions of
Filipinos struggling to break free from the cycle of poverty.
Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282,
senseneres.blogspot.com
05-27-2025
Comments
Post a Comment