PLANNING FOR SECURE GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS

 PLANNING FOR SECURE GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS

In the United States, there exists a dedicated federal agency that is solely responsible for building, managing, and maintaining government facilities: the General Services Administration (GSA). Within the GSA, the Public Buildings Service (PBS) takes charge of acquiring, constructing, leasing, and maintaining a vast portfolio of federal properties. Their mission is not only to meet the evolving needs of government agencies but also to ensure sustainability, cost-efficiency, and even the preservation of historic buildings.

Here in the Philippines, we have no such equivalent. There is no single agency that handles the development and management of government buildings in a centralized and strategic manner. Instead, each government agency is left to fend for itself—either building its own facilities or perpetually leasing private ones.

This fragmented setup has led to a curious and costly phenomenon: many national government agencies (NGAs) end up leasing privately owned buildings for decades, despite the reality that they could have already purchased or built their own spaces for less. These leases go on and on, and the money that could have been used to build government-owned infrastructure gets siphoned off into rent payments.

Take a walk around any city hall or municipal center and you’ll see the pattern: satellite offices of NGAs scattered across various privately owned buildings. Most of these, of course, are rented. What if, instead, there were government-owned buildings where these agencies could lease space under the umbrella of the national government? It would be both economical and, in today’s world, more secure.

Gone are the days when security was a minor concern for government offices. In an era where terrorism is a real and present danger, every public office—no matter how small—can be a potential target. Security must now be integral to the planning and management of government infrastructure.

That’s why we must ask: Shouldn’t the Philippines have its own version of the GSA?

If we were to designate a government body to take on that role, one strong candidate comes to mind—the Department of Budget and Management (DBM). Contrary to a common misconception, DBM doesn’t stand for "Department of Budget Management." But names aside, DBM is strategically positioned to manage government buildings due to its direct control over the budgetary allocations of NGAs.

Imagine if DBM owned and operated government office buildings. It could directly deduct rental fees from the budget allocations of its tenant agencies. Even Local Government Units (LGUs) could have their rentals deducted from their Internal Revenue Allotments (IRAs). This system would simplify fiscal management while eliminating redundant overhead costs.

More importantly, centralizing NGAs and LGUs in government-owned complexes would drastically improve security. With exclusive government-use buildings, we can implement modern technologies such as QR codes, RFID tags, NFC access, facial recognition, and other biometric systems to monitor entrances and exits effectively.

And it doesn't end with security. Centralized, government-operated buildings open the door to more advanced, integrated systems—shared data centers, fiber optic networks, satellite connectivity, and robust local area networks (LANs). We could also deploy smart building management systems (BMS) and Internet of Things (IoT) applications to optimize operations and utilities.

The benefits stretch even further: these buildings could serve as testbeds for sustainable government infrastructure. Solar panels, rainwater collection systems, sewage treatment plants (STPs), biogas digesters, and materials recovery facilities (MRFs) could all be implemented and maintained under a shared sustainability plan.

It’s high time we rethink how we plan, build, and secure our government buildings. If we want to maximize our resources, improve public service, and protect the lives of government workers and the public they serve, then a unified approach to government infrastructure isn’t just wise—it’s essential.

Is the DBM up to the task? Should a new agency be created? Should Congress take a closer look at this issue? These are questions we should be asking—urgently.

Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres

iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com

06-04-2025

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES?

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES? When we talk about the crime rate in the Philippines, we often assume that the figures we see are accurate reflections of reality. But have we ever paused to ask—how exactly is the crime rate computed? Where does this data come from, and how reliable is it? The computation of the crime rate in the Philippines is officially handled by the Philippine National Police (PNP). The formula itself is straightforward: Crime Rate = (Total Reported Crimes / Total Population) x 100,000 This simple equation gives us the number of crimes per 100,000 people, allowing for fair comparison across regions and time periods. However, the reality behind these numbers is more complex than it appears. Data from the Ground The foundation of our national crime rate is empirical data collected at the grassroots level—from individual police stations scattered across the country. Every reported crime is logged in local police blotters, forming the buil...
Read more

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS Dear Mr. President: May I ask who is going to be the arbiter or referee whenever there are overlaps in functions between two or more government agencies? I imagine that there would be no problem if these agencies would just cooperate and collaborate with each other, but what if they are unable to settle their differences and they would just end up throwing blame at each other or finger pointing at each other? Allow me to cite some examples. Who is supposed to take the lead in waste to energy projects? Is it supposed to be the DENR that is supposed to handle waste? Or is it supposed to be the DOE that is supposed to handle energy generation? Or is it supposed to be the DILG since it is the one that could direct or influence the waste to energy projects of LGUs? Who is supposed to take the lead in producing and promoting the use of biofuels? Is it supposed to be the DA, since the production of biofuels is supposed to be all about planting biofuel ...
Read more

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES As it is supposed to be, anyone in the Philippines should be able to dial 911, and a telephone operator should be able to dispatch fire, rescue, ambulance and police (FRAP) units as soon as possible, based on acceptable response times. I invented the FRAP acronym for easy recall, and I hope it sticks, if there is no other alternative. Unfortunately, due to a mixture of technical and political reasons, the Philippines has not adopted 911 as a national number, because some LGUs would rather use their own three-digit numbers such as 117 and 168. I actually proposed a technical solution to that problem, but it was not adopted either. For whatever it is worth, my solution is to install a call forwarding system that could route all calls to a central operator, regardless of what number is dialed. It is very sad for me to know that up to now, even if our country is already over one hundred years old, there are still many LGUs that do not have fire trucks. it ...
Read more