ALTERNATIVE TENURIAL LANDS FOR INDIGENOUS TRIBAL PEOPLES
ALTERNATIVE TENURIAL LANDS FOR INDIGENOUS TRIBAL PEOPLES
The Indigenous People’s Republic Act (IPRA)
stands as a landmark law, providing the legal foundation for Indigenous Tribal
Peoples (ITPs) to claim ancestral lands through the Certificate of Ancestral
Domain Title (CADT). However, while the law is sound in principle, the reality
is that many ITPs struggle to secure these land titles, leaving them without
tenurial rights over the lands they have occupied for generations.
In some cases, applications for CADTs are
denied, leaving ITPs in a state of limbo—without legal ownership or security
over their homes and resources. This precarious situation calls for an
alternative solution, and perhaps local government units (LGUs) can take the
lead in facilitating alternative tenurial land applications for ITPs through
other legal means.
One potential pathway is through the
Integrated Forest Management Agreement (IFMA) or the Indigenous Community
Conserved Areas (ICCA) program. Since any entity can apply for these
programs—why not assist ITPs in obtaining these tenurial rights as well, even
if temporary? The security provided by these arrangements, even for a defined
period, would allow indigenous communities to engage in productive activities
and establish sustainable livelihoods, while they are waiting for their CADTs
to be approved.
In many cases, ITPs already reside in coastal
or mountainous regions. Would it not be reasonable to officially grant them
legal rights to these lands, using other instruments? Aside from IFMA, there
are other programs such as the Community-Based Forest Management Agreement
(CBFMA), the Socialized Industrial Forest Management Agreement (SIFMA), and the
Special Forest Land Use Agreement (FLAg) that could be leveraged to provide
security to ITPs.
LGUs should take the lead in these
initiatives by organizing joint efforts with their Indigenous Peoples Mandatory
Representatives (IPMRs). As de facto members of Municipal Development Councils
(MDCs), IPMRs have a direct line to local governance and can ensure these
issues are included in policy discussions—provided the mayor prioritizes them.
If these ideas were put into action, ITPs
could actively contribute to sustainable development through reforestation
projects and coastal restoration initiatives. The Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (DENR), alongside their local offices (PENROs and MENROs),
should make this a priority. Furthermore, this could evolve into a
Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model, where LGUs work with private entities
to fund and implement these initiatives.
The Integrated Forest Management Agreement
(IFMA) already provides a structure for sustainable land use. The
Community-Based Forest Management Agreement (CBFMA) enables local communities
to manage forests while maintaining environmental sustainability. The ICCA
program, which focuses on biodiversity conservation through indigenous
governance, is another viable option for securing land tenure for ITPs.
With proper implementation, these programs
could provide ITPs with much-needed legal security over the lands they occupy
while allowing them to contribute to conservation and sustainable development
efforts. The challenge lies in organizing and facilitating access to these
programs—but with proactive LGUs, this vision can become a reality. It would be
good to know if the National Commission for Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) could also
weigh in on this idea.
Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282,
senseneres.blogspot.com
05-26-2025
Comments
Post a Comment