INTEGRATING SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOOD PROGRAMS
INTEGRATING SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOOD PROGRAMS
The Philippine
government has long recognized the importance of livelihood programs in
fighting poverty and uplifting communities. Several National Government
Agencies (NGAs), such as the Department of Social Welfare and Development
(DSWD) and the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE), have their own
livelihood initiatives, each designed to address specific sectors and needs.
This is good news — but it also raises an important question: Are these
programs well-coordinated, or are they running in silos, duplicating efforts
and missing opportunities for synergy?
I can’t help but
look back to my own experiences around forty years ago, when I was actively
involved in government livelihood programs under the then Ministry of Human Settlements (MHS). Back
then, MHS adopted a forward-thinking strategy called "Shelter cum Livelihood", which aimed to
combine housing programs with income-generating opportunities for
beneficiaries. The idea was simple yet powerful — helping people earn so they
could sustain their mortgage payments and improve their lives.
I started my
livelihood work with Bliss Marketing
Corporation (Blissmark), a subsidiary of the Human Settlements
Development Corporation (HSDC). Our mandate was to develop and market new
products from the MHS livelihood projects. Later, I moved to the University of Life (UL), where we
trained housing project beneficiaries in various livelihood skills. Eventually,
I joined the National Livelihood Program
Secretariat (NLPS), more commonly known as the Kilusang Kabuhayan at Kaunlaran (KKK).
Looking back,
one key lesson stood out: Marketing is
the heart and soul of any livelihood program. Training, financing, and
even packaging inputs are all important, but without strong marketing support,
these livelihood products would end up collecting dust in storage rooms or
local fairs. That was precisely why Blissmark
was created — to fill the crucial gap of linking products to markets.
Interestingly, many of the experts in Blissmark were recruited from San Miguel Corporation, bringing their
marketing expertise into the government’s development efforts. I was fortunate
to join them as a Group Product Manager, eventually earning the rank of
Assistant Vice President.
I firmly
believe that the Blissmark concept is still highly relevant
today, especially considering the many housing projects across the country
where beneficiaries struggle with mortgage payments. These families need
livelihood opportunities, but more than that, they need a clear path to the market — proper
product positioning, attractive packaging, and strong branding.
Fast forward to
today, we see many livelihood programs being implemented by various NGAs,
including DSWD’s Sustainable Livelihood
Program (SLP) and DOLE’s Kabuhayan
Program. These programs provide essential support — from seed
capital and tools to skills training and employment facilitation. They empower
communities, especially the poor and vulnerable, to create sustainable incomes.
However, the question remains: Are these
programs helping to create products that can compete
in the market? Are they tapping
into market experts who can
guide beneficiaries on branding, pricing, and product development?
The DSWD’s Sustainable Livelihood Program (SLP)
does a commendable job of combining microenterprise development with employment
facilitation, helping beneficiaries build businesses or find gainful
employment. DOLE’s Kabuhayan Program
likewise provides funding, training, and materials to help vulnerable groups
create and sustain small businesses. These efforts are valuable, but I can’t
help but wonder: How often do these
agencies coordinate with each other, or with local government units (LGUs), to
ensure that products from different programs are not just viable but also
competitive?
It’s
heartbreaking to see some livelihood products being poorly positioned, poorly
packaged, and lacking a strong brand identity. These products, if only
improved, could command better prices and generate better incomes for the
beneficiaries. I sincerely hope that NGAs, LGUs, and even private sector
partners could integrate marketing
strategies into every livelihood program. This is not just about
creating products — it’s about creating
products that sell.
If some LGUs
have their own livelihood products, I would be more than willing to connect them with experts who could help
with product positioning, packaging, and branding. After all, sustainable
livelihood does not end at production — it thrives when products find markets,
and when markets see value in these products.
More
importantly, the spirit of collaboration
must prevail. DSWD, DOLE, DTI, DA, and other agencies all have
excellent livelihood programs. But if these efforts could be integrated into a cohesive, market-driven
approach, the impact would multiply many times over.
Let’s work
together — national agencies, LGUs, civil society, and even private
corporations — to harmonize livelihood
programs into a truly
sustainable ecosystem, one that empowers communities not just to
produce, but to profit. Let’s make sure every livelihood product is market-ready, every entrepreneur is equipped to succeed, and every community
is given a fair shot at prosperity.
In the end,
sustainable livelihood is not just about skills and seed capital — it’s about
opening doors to real markets and real opportunities. Let’s integrate our
efforts, so no Filipino livelihood product is left behind.
Ramon Ike V. Seneres,
www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com
04-11-2025
Comments
Post a Comment