RENAMING THE PHILIPPINE DEER
RENAMING THE PHILIPPINE DEER
The Philippine brown deer (Rusa marianna)
carries a name that raises a fundamental question: why is our endemic species
named after a foreign location? This peculiar situation stems from history.
French naturalist Anselme Gaƫtan Desmarest first described the species in 1822,
based on specimens found in the Mariana Islands. However, the deer did not
originate there—it was introduced from the Philippines, likely for hunting
purposes.
Thus, we face an odd reality: our very own
native deer species bears a name that honors a different place. How can we
correct this error?
First, it is crucial to understand that
scientific names follow strict international conventions governed by
taxonomists. However, there have been instances where countries have
successfully changed species names to reflect national identity. For example,
the Pithecophaga jefferyi, once known as the monkey-eating eagle, is
now rightly called the Philippine eagle.
A logical and patriotic step forward would be
to rename Rusa marianna as Rusa philippenses or Rusa
filipiniana. This initiative could be undertaken by Filipino scientists,
endorsed by conservation groups, and even formalized through legislative
action. If necessary, we can submit this name change to the International Code
of Zoological Nomenclature for consideration.
Beyond renaming, we should also elevate the
Philippine deer’s status. One way to do this is by featuring it on our currency
and postage stamps. The Philippine eagle enjoys this honor—why not our own deer
as well?
Another issue to consider is the designation
of the national animal. Currently, the carabao holds this title, but it is not
uniquely Filipino. Carabaos are found in other parts of Asia and have even been
interbred with foreign species. Meanwhile, the tamaraw is an excellent
alternative, being endemic to Mindoro. But if the tamaraw is not a viable
choice, why not consider the Philippine deer?
Importantly, the Philippine brown deer is not
our only native deer species. The country is home to four recognized
subspecies:
· R. m. marianna
(Luzon biogeographic region)
· R. m. barandana (Mindoro)
· R. m. nigella
(upland areas of Mindanao)
· R. m. nigricans (lowland sites of Mindanao)
Our indigenous peoples have long honored the
Philippine deer in their cultures. Among the Bagobo-Tagabawa, for instance, the
deer is considered a cultural keystone species. Its antlers are used in
traditional medicine, and its presence is woven into their spiritual beliefs.
Protecting the deer is not just an ecological responsibility but a cultural one
as well.
To that end, we must take concrete steps to
safeguard the Philippine deer:
1.
Pass laws
prohibiting its hunting in the wild.
2.
Expand
conservation programs in protected zones.
3.
Strengthen local
breeding programs to ensure its survival.
As we assert our national identity, renaming
the Philippine deer is not just a matter of nomenclature—it is an assertion of
pride, heritage, and responsibility. If we could rightfully rename the
Philippine eagle, then surely, we can reclaim our own Philippine deer as well.
Ramon Ike V. Seneres,
www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com
03-08-2025
Comments
Post a Comment