MANAGING A NATIONAL CANCER CARE PROGRAM

MANAGING A NATIONAL CANCER CARE PROGRAM

The recent announcement that the government has earmarked P3 billion for cancer care and assistance is a step in the right direction. However, several questions arise about how this program will be managed and implemented effectively.

Who Will Lead the Implementation? The Department of Health (DOH) is the most likely lead implementing agency, but will it work alone, or will the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) also play a role in mobilizing local government units (LGUs)? Given the scale of the initiative, coordination among various agencies is crucial to ensure effective nationwide implementation.

Funding Allocation and Coverage: A critical concern is how the P3 billion budget will be distributed across different types of cancers. Will there be prioritization based on mortality rates, prevalence, or cost of treatment? Additionally, will the program cover outpatient care and medicines, or will funding be limited to hospitalization? Many cancer patients struggle with the high costs of outpatient chemotherapy and medications, and failing to include these aspects could undermine the program’s effectiveness.

Interaction with Existing Programs: The Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) and PhilHealth already provide some cancer-related financial assistance. Will the new program complement these existing efforts, or will there be potential overlaps and conflicts? Ensuring a streamlined approach is key to maximizing resources and avoiding bureaucratic delays that hinder patient access.

International Models and Readiness: Is the new cancer care initiative modeled after successful programs in other countries, such as Australia, the United States, or South Korea? If so, which elements have been adapted for the Philippine healthcare system? Furthermore, was the announcement based on a fully developed implementation plan, or is the government still drafting the necessary rules and regulations? A common issue in healthcare legislation is the delay in finalizing Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRRs), which could stall the program’s rollout.

Involvement of Key Stakeholders: Was the Philippine Cancer Society or other medical associations consulted before the law was passed? Their input is crucial in shaping a practical and effective program. Additionally, if approximately 35,040 Filipinos die from cancer annually, how many lives does the government project will be saved through this initiative? If 194 cancer cases are diagnosed per 100,000 patients today, how will this number change under the new program?

National Cancer Database and Accessibility: A robust cancer patient database is essential for tracking cases, monitoring treatment outcomes, and ensuring equitable access. Does the new law provide for such a database, and if so, how will it be maintained? More importantly, how can we guarantee that even the poorest patients benefit from cancer care and medication support?

Long-Term Vision and Infrastructure: Does the program offer long-term care beyond initial consultations? Will government hospitals be upgraded to provide specialized cancer treatments? Addressing these concerns is essential if the country aims to achieve a cancer-free status in the future.

Human Resource Challenges: The Philippines faces a shortage of oncologists, with only around 112 radiation oncologists serving the entire country. Given the demand, was this law passed with a plan to increase the number of trained oncologists? Will there be incentives for general practitioners to specialize in oncology? Furthermore, does the law include provisions for a dedicated national cancer hospital, like the Philippine Heart Center (PHC) or the National Kidney and Transplant Institute (NKTI)?

These questions demand urgent answers. While the allocation of P3 billion is commendable, it must be backed by a concrete, well-structured implementation plan. Otherwise, this much-needed initiative risks falling into the common pitfalls of underfunded, poorly executed government programs. Cancer patients in the Philippines deserve better—and the success of this program will be measured not just in pesos spent, but in lives saved.

Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com

03-03-2025

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES?

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES? When we talk about the crime rate in the Philippines, we often assume that the figures we see are accurate reflections of reality. But have we ever paused to ask—how exactly is the crime rate computed? Where does this data come from, and how reliable is it? The computation of the crime rate in the Philippines is officially handled by the Philippine National Police (PNP). The formula itself is straightforward: Crime Rate = (Total Reported Crimes / Total Population) x 100,000 This simple equation gives us the number of crimes per 100,000 people, allowing for fair comparison across regions and time periods. However, the reality behind these numbers is more complex than it appears. Data from the Ground The foundation of our national crime rate is empirical data collected at the grassroots level—from individual police stations scattered across the country. Every reported crime is logged in local police blotters, forming the buil...
Read more

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS Dear Mr. President: May I ask who is going to be the arbiter or referee whenever there are overlaps in functions between two or more government agencies? I imagine that there would be no problem if these agencies would just cooperate and collaborate with each other, but what if they are unable to settle their differences and they would just end up throwing blame at each other or finger pointing at each other? Allow me to cite some examples. Who is supposed to take the lead in waste to energy projects? Is it supposed to be the DENR that is supposed to handle waste? Or is it supposed to be the DOE that is supposed to handle energy generation? Or is it supposed to be the DILG since it is the one that could direct or influence the waste to energy projects of LGUs? Who is supposed to take the lead in producing and promoting the use of biofuels? Is it supposed to be the DA, since the production of biofuels is supposed to be all about planting biofuel ...
Read more

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES As it is supposed to be, anyone in the Philippines should be able to dial 911, and a telephone operator should be able to dispatch fire, rescue, ambulance and police (FRAP) units as soon as possible, based on acceptable response times. I invented the FRAP acronym for easy recall, and I hope it sticks, if there is no other alternative. Unfortunately, due to a mixture of technical and political reasons, the Philippines has not adopted 911 as a national number, because some LGUs would rather use their own three-digit numbers such as 117 and 168. I actually proposed a technical solution to that problem, but it was not adopted either. For whatever it is worth, my solution is to install a call forwarding system that could route all calls to a central operator, regardless of what number is dialed. It is very sad for me to know that up to now, even if our country is already over one hundred years old, there are still many LGUs that do not have fire trucks. it ...
Read more