KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
My dear countrymen, the good news is, there is a
system for rating the performance of mayors and governors, based on Key
Performance Indicators (KPIs). The bad news is, it is difficult to find the
data online, not even on the DILG website. The website has a search engine, but
it returns a blank every time I search for “KPIs). It is either the data is not
there at all, or the website is not really that user friendly, such that it is
difficult to search for data.
According to Microsoft Copilot, “the Seal
of Good Local Governance (SGLG) program is an initiative by the Department
of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) that sets the criteria for
evaluating the performance of local government units (LGUs), including
provinces, cities, and municipalities. The goal is to promote transparency,
accountability, and effective governance”.
The following are the
criteria
for SGLG Evaluation, also according to Copilot:
1.
Financial
Administration: Efficient use of
resources and proper management of public funds.
2.
Disaster
Preparedness: Readiness to
respond to natural disasters and emergencies.
3.
Social
Protection: Programs for the
welfare of the disadvantaged and vulnerable sectors.
4.
Peace and
Order: Maintenance of public
safety and security.
5.
Business
Friendliness and Competitiveness:
Creation of a conducive environment for businesses to thrive.
6.
Environmental
Management: Sustainable
practices for protecting the environment.
7.
Tourism,
Culture, and Arts: Promotion and
development of local tourism and cultural heritage.
Copilot further says that “Mayors and
governors are evaluated based on these criteria, and those who meet or exceed
the standards are awarded the SGLG. This recognition not only brings prestige
but also qualifies the LGU for the Performance Challenge Fund
(PCF), which provides financial incentives for further development projects”.
I do not know about you, but would it not be a good
idea if we could just convince all our voters to vote only for the winners of
the SGLG? Or perhaps those who have the potential of winning that award? In so
many ways, the SGLG is like a scorecard, in other words a grading system that
could objectively tell us who are doing very well in serving their constituents
and who are not. In a manner of speaking this is about knowing who the passers
and who the flunkers are.
Presumably, the flunkers in this case are those who
are dumb, lazy or incompetent, that is why they fail to make the grade. But if
the people are the ones voting for them repeatedly, who do you think are dumb? Albert
Einstein said that “insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and
expecting different results”. Surely, no one could say that Einstein is dumb in
saying that.
Many of those who believe that they are not dumb do
not like the idea of actors, athletes and other seemingly unqualified people to
run for public office. Sad to say, we could not stop them from running, because
we are a democracy. But what if they win the SGLG awards during their first
term? Would it not prove that they are not dumb? Your friend, IKE SENERES/12-27-24/visit my blog
senseneres.blogspot.com
Comments
Post a Comment