UNDERSTANDING THE PERCEIVED HUNGER RATE
UNDERSTANDING THE PERCEIVED HUNGER RATE
To my fellow Filipinos: Perhaps most
of us know what the latest perceived hunger rate of the Philippines is, but how many
of us understand how the data was collected? Let us look at how the Social
Weather Stations (SWS) does it. The SWS uses a sample size of 1,200
respondents. The four regions surveyed are the National Capital Region (NCR),
and the balance of Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao. Each region uses a sample size
of a minimum of 300 respondents.
The first
question asked is this: “In the past three months, has your family ever
experienced hunger and not have anything to eat?” If the answer is yes, the
follow up question is this: “Did it happen only once, a few times, often or
always?”. If the respondent answers “only once or a few times”, he or she is categorized
under “moderate hunger”. If the respondent answers “often or always”, he or she
is categorized under “severe hunger”.
Based on the
data collected, the SWS concluded that the incidence of hunger in the
Philippines as of the first quarter of 2024 was 14.2%, of which 12.2% is under
the moderate category, and 2.0% is under the severe category. Based on an
estimated total population of 117 million people, that amounts to about 16
million hungry people. What are we going to do with that data? Which government
agency is responsible for dealing with this problem? Many people would probably
say that this is a problem for the DSWD to solve, but that is only partially
correct.
There is no
question in my mind that DSWD is in charge of poverty alleviation, but which
agency is really in charge of poverty reduction? Sad to say, in my long career
as a government official, I have met some who do not even know the difference
between poverty alleviation and poverty reduction. To me, poverty alleviation
is like easing the pain of poverty, but not liberating a person from the
condition of poverty itself.
It does not
really take a genius to understand that the problem of hunger is a subset of
the problem of poverty, and that the problem of malnutrition is a subset of the
problem of hunger. Down the line, it also does not take a genius to understand
that the problem of stunting in children is a subset of the problem of malnutrition.
In other words, this is a domino effect that we must stop. It is a vicious cycle
that that we must terminate.
It also does
not take a genius to realize that if a person has a means of livelihood like a
job or a business, he or she could be liberated from poverty, assuming that he
or she will be earning a steady income. The solution to the problem of poverty
is therefore no other than livelihood. That said, I will now repeat my question:
which agency is in charge of livelihood? Or to be more precise, who is in charge
of livelihood creation? To answer these two questions, I think that it is best
to answer this other question: which agency is in charge of poverty reduction? Very truly yours, IKE SENERES/11-07-2024
Comments
Post a Comment