DATA DRIVEN VERSUS HEADLINE DRIVEN GOVERNANCE
DATA DRIVEN VERSUS HEADLINE DRIVEN GOVERNANCE
My fellow
Filipinos: There is no question that the two houses of our Congress have the power
to conduct public hearings “in aid of legislation”. However, I wish that these
public hearings will be data driven, instead of being headline driven. Of course,
I am not blaming our lawmakers to conduct public hearings based on what the hot
issues are in the news, but perhaps they should learn to balance their topics
with needs that are based on empirical data.
In my
opinion, what could be considered as “data driven” is practically the same as what
could be considered as “demand driven”. To be able to illustrate my point, allow
me to use some examples about what is in demand in the healthcare industry. As everyone
knows, many of our loved ones died during the Covid 19 pandemic, because of the
lack of beds, ventilators and medicines, among many others. Given that example,
our lawmakers should have conducted public hearings about the inventory of
beds, ventilators and medicines, so that they could pass laws that will address
the shortages.
To cite
another example, I know for a fact that there are still many LGUs that do not
have ambulance units and even if they do, not have the qualified and certified EMT
personnel who are supposed to man these units. Aside from that, these LGUs also
do not have 911 systems that could dispatch police, fire, ambulance and rescue
units in the event of emergencies. Ideally, the LGUs in the island communities
should have sea ambulances, but they do not have that either. The problem is,
these issues do not come out in the headlines, and that is why no public hearings
are conducted about them.
Every year, the
two houses of Congress conducts public hearings to question and review the
budget proposals of the National Government Agencies (NGAs), the end result of
which is to eventually pass and approve the General Appropriations Act (GAA). During
these deliberations, would it not be possible instead for the two houses to
present their own data about what is really the “demand”, based on their own empirical
research? I think that this is not an impossible task, because these two houses
have their own research and development units.
In theory,
the government is supposed to have a Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan (MTPDP)
that is supposed to coincide with the term of the incumbent President of the
Philippines. In theory again, the GAAs of every year could be tailored to
support the MTPDP. Aside from that, the GAAs could also be tailored to support
the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) under the United Nations that will end
in 2030. There is no shame in admitting that we failed to meet the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) when it ended in 2015, but there is still time to make
sure that we will meet most of the goals before the deadline in 2030, or at
least the more important goals in relation to poverty, hunger and climate change.
That should be the priority subjects to discuss “in aid of legislation”. Your friend, IKE SENERES/11-12-2024
Comments
Post a Comment