USING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR AGRICULTURE
USING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR AGRICULTURE
Dear Mr.
President: There are at least eight government agencies that should be involved
in using technology for agriculture, but as of now, they are seemingly not
coordinating with each other. These agencies are DICT, DA, DAR, DENR, CHED, TESDA,
NAMRIA and PhilSpace.
The roles of
DICT and DA are obvious, because they are the two major players in the
challenge of using information technology for agriculture. The role of DAR comes
into play, because agriculture development is the next step after agrarian
reform and land distribution. DENR should also be involved, because there are
overlaps in planting trees and other crops in mountains and other public lands.
CHED should also be involved, because there are many SUCs that have developed new
information technologies that have yet to be commercialized. And lastly, TESDA
should be involved, because they should already be teaching information and
communications technology (ICT) skills to vocational and technical students.
NAMRIA is in possession of a lot of geographical data, not only for
agriculture. PhilSpace is our very own space
agency,
Mr.
President, it could no longer be denied that modern agriculture must already
use ICT technology today, if it is to succeed at all. Without using ICT
technology, it would be very difficult for agriculture, not only in production,
but also in processing, packaging, financing, logistics and marketing. And just
like any other industry, agriculture needs ICT resources namely hardware,
software, connectivity and manpower.
Many years
ago, there was a lot of discussion about the so-called “knowledge economy”,
meaning the economy that utilizes ICT resources, among its many definitions. At
that time, the conversations focused on the idea that in the “knowledge
economy”, everyone must be a “knowledge worker”, meaning that everyone should
have computer skills of one level or another.
I was one of
those who provided technical support to the senators who passed the e-commerce
law, and at that time, I remember that the conversations focused on the
prediction that in the future, if companies will not adopt e-commerce, it would
be as if they would not be doing any commerce at all. Clearly, that has become
a reality now. Based on that, it would not be far fetched to say that soon, if farmers
will not adopt ICT technologies, they will not be doing any agriculture at all.
Obviously,
farmers would also need e-commerce to sell their goods, but that is not all
that they would need. On the production side, they would need a lot of data
inputs to be able to know what to plant, when to plant and where to plant. And
for the new crops, they would also need information about how to plant them.
Among the
ICT resources that could be used for agriculture are satellites, drones, low
orbit balloons, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) devices, Internet of Things
(IoT) devices. Aside from data collection, low orbit balloons could also be
used for internet connectivity, the same as satellites. IoT devices are mostly sensors that could detect
and measure heat, coldness and motion, among others. IoT devices can use
non-commercial forms of connectivity, such as Long Range (LoRa) and TV white
space (TVWS). LoRa is a type of long-range, low power wireless data
communications technology. It uses a modulation technique called Chirp Spread
Spectrum (CSS). TVWS are the unused frequencies between the VHF and UHF spectra.
Mr. President,
perhaps the lack of coordination between these eight agencies could be made
possible if you could create a new task force, or perhaps you could issue a new
Executive Order to give this effort a stronger executive authority. Such an
initiative could also greatly contribute to our food security. IKE SENERES/10-23-2024
Comments
Post a Comment