INCENTIVES FOR AFFORESTATION
INCENTIVES FOR AFFORESTATION
Dear Mr. President: In the aftermath of the typhoons
and landslides that happened in our country, we have been reminded again, as we
have been reminded before, that we must plant trees, not just a few seedlings
here and there, but millions of it, as much as we could. It has become clear
that trees could not only prevent water from trickling very fast to the
lowlands, but they also prevent landslides.
What has already become clear to most of us Filipinos
is that one of the major causes of floods is the loss of forest cover, meaning
that our mountains have become denuded, because the trees that used to thrive
there were totally cut and were not replanted. Replanting or reforestation is one
side of the equation Mr. President, because there is another side to the
equation, which is afforestation.
According to Microsoft Copilot, “afforestation is the
process of planting trees in an area that has not previously forested, to
create a new forest. This is different from reforestation, which involves
replanting trees in areas where forests have been depleted”. Copilot adds that
just like reforestation, “afforestation could help deter climate change by
absorbing carbon dioxide, preventing soil erosion, and enhancing biodiversity”.
Realistically speaking Mr. President, is afforestation
too much to ask from a people who were not able to do reforestation, as simple
as it is? Is it too much to ask from the DENR, the government that is
apparently failing to implement the National Greening Program (NGP)? I believe Sir,
that my answer to these two questions is yes. I say that because I believe that
these two questions are political in nature and are not technical in nature. My
answer is yes, because I believe that with the right political will, it could
be done, but with the right political leadership of course.
Realistically speaking Sir, I think that it is difficult
to tell which areas in our country were previously forested, and which areas
were not. Some areas that were previously forested could be 100% devoid of
trees now, such that there is no longer a hint at all that a forest used to
thrive there. Perhaps in the lowlands, the planting of new trees could no
longer stop the floods and the landslides, but at least, new trees could still
absorb carbon dioxide, and even feed fresh water to the aquafers.
Mr. President, since the implementation of the NGP is
apparently still ongoing, perhaps you could investigate it to be able to what
its progress is. I suggest however Sir, that NGP should have clear targets about
how many square kilometers should be planted, and which mountains should be
planted. I also suggest Sir, that the progress of the planting and the new
growth should be monitored both by drones and by satellite images, for comparison
purposes.
May I also request Sir, that the DENR be instructed to
plant only native species? For that matter, I think that it would be wise to
cut down and remove the invasive tree species, while the native tree species
are being planted. In addition to that Sir, may I also request that you also
include the planting of mangrove forests in the NGP? I know for a fact that
some LGUs and NGOs are planting mangrove propagules in some places, but no one
seems to be planning to grow new mangrove forests, except perhaps Yolanda survivor
Gary Dabansol who planted 10,000 mangrove trees all by himself in his village
in Matalom, Leyte, knowing that it could provide additional protection against
storm surges. IKE SENERES/10-31-2024
Comments
Post a Comment