USING PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
USING PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
Dear Mr. President: By definition, a project should have a beginning and
an end. If it has no beginning, then it is not a project at all. That is like
saying that a problem should have a solution, otherwise, it is not a problem. In
other words, it could not be a problem if it could not be solved, at least mathematically.
Continuing with this comparison, a project should have defined problem that has
to be solved through a solution. Once that problem is solved, then that would
mean that the project should already end.
The conventional wisdom in governance is that
everything should start with a policy, in other words a policy framework. To implement
the policy frameworks, there should be program plans that are derived from
these policies. In theory, all project proposals should be derived from official
policies that are derived from program plans. What that means is that there
should be no projects that are not rooted in official policies.
Official policies could either be based on national
laws, department orders, provincial board resolutions or municipal ordinances. It
goes without saying that these policy statements should have corresponding
provisions for funding mechanisms, otherwise, no program plans could be prepared,
and no project proposals could be considered. A policy basis is needed for all
projects, even if it does not involve costs on the part of the government, such
as Public and Private Partnership (PPP) programs.
There are many Projects Management (PM) software that
are available in the market, some are for free, while the others are not. Among
those that are free are the PM software of ERP Next and Odoo. Among those that
are not for free are the PM software of Microsoft and Teamwork. ERP Next and
Odoo both belong to the “Free and Open-Source Software” (FOSS) category. However,
it is only the software license that are free in the FOSS category, but there
are optional costs such as customization and integration with the client’s
existing systems.
In my many years of managing computerization projects,
I have met many professionals who would rather use Microsoft Excel to create
Gantt charts for the purpose of monitoring the progress. At best however, using
Microsoft Excel might be good enough, but the best option is to really use real
PM software such as MS Projects, Teamwork, ERP Next or Odoo, including the
other options such as www.monday.com, Click
Up and Wrike.
Regardless of what brand is used, the point that I am
trying to make is that all managers of all projects in the government should be
using PM software, not only because it makes project management more efficient,
but also it makes project management more transparent, and thus are lesser
prone to corruption. Add to that the fact that the data in the PM software are easily
understood by most “laymen”, even if they have no technical background.
Mr. President, for those National Government Agencies (NGAs) and Local
Government Units (LGUs) that would prefer to use FOSS because of budget
constraints, I am willing to help them. Their only expense if ever, would be
some consulting fees that they would pay to some Information and Communications
Technology (ICT) professionals that are generally affordable. Hopefully, by using
PM software, the NGAs and LGUs will no longer have projects that are not finished
on time or are not finished at all, because of one reason or another. IKE
SENERES/09-29-2024
Comments
Post a Comment