RECYCLING ELECTRONIC WASTE
RECYCLING ELECTRONIC WASTE
Dear Mr. President: It appears that there is no
existing government program right now that addresses the problem of collecting
and electronic waste. Electronic waste includes not only personal computers, workstations,
servers and mobile phones, but all machines and devices that have processors,
keyboards, keypads and memory units. The problem is many of these wastes
contain toxic materials that are toxic to the environment.
In the private companies, it is very easy to get rid
of these wastes because they could auction these off easily. That is not the end
of the problem however, because no one knows what they do with the toxic
remains after they extract the valuable materials such as metals, such as gold
even. Probably, they could end up in the dumpsites or landfills. It could still
be a problem if the toxic wastes would end up in the landfills, because of leaching.
In the government side however, it would be more
difficult to get rid of the electronic wastes, because the properties would
have to be declared first as “unserviceable”. That is a vague terminology,
because some of these properties are still repairable so to speak. So, the
remaining alternative is to auction them off, a process that could take a long
time. The more logical choice, however, is to donate these to the Local
Government Units (LGUs) that may have the budgets to repair them.
Among the LGUs, it is obvious that the first class and
second class LGUs could afford to buy their own computers, but it is a big challenge
for the third class, fourth class and fifth class LGUs to do that. In general,
however, most of these lower class LGUs would have the budgets to repair the “unserviceable”
computers. If not, they could probably get donors to raise the money to pay for
the repairs.
Another idea is to donate these “unserviceable”
computers to TESDA, so that the vocational schools could use them for actual
computer repair. There is no better alternative to learning computer repair through
actual hands-on exercises. I have seen that happen in my entire career, from
the time I was the ICT manager of DFA, to the time that I was the ICT manager
of PCSO. Personally, I find much enjoyment in bringing back dead computers to
life.
If not TESDA, I know of some NGOs that are very good
at repairing “unserviceable” computers. I could vouch for these NGOs, because I
have already tried their repair services. As a matter of fact, they not only
repair these “broken” units, but they could also upgrade them, so that they
could become faster and better. In theory, most of these “broken” units could
be repaired. The only concern is that as a rule, the costs of repair should not
be more than half the value of new units.
Mr. President, there are only two choices when it comes
to LGU computerization. Either they are given money to procure new units, or they
are given money to repair the old units. Without working usable computer units,
they could not computerize. Without computerization, they could not move
forward to digitalization. If you would want it Sir, we could try this out with
a few “unserviceable” units from any National Government Agency (NGA), so that
we could enable a lower-class LGU to computerize and digitalize. IKE SENERES/09-25-2024
Comments
Post a Comment