PATHWAYS TO PROFESSIONS
PATHWAYS TO PROFESSIONS
Dear Mr. President: Perhaps the problem of the
so-called “mismatch” in the job market has already come to your attention? According
to the statistics, every year, there are thousands of college graduates who could
not find jobs, while there are supposedly thousands of jobs that could not be
filled, because the qualifications of the job applicants supposedly do not meet
the requirements of the prospective employers.
I know that there could be many possible solutions to
the said problem, but may I present to you one solution that could possibly
work? For lack of a better term, I am temporarily calling it “Pathways to
Professions” (P2P). This is not a new idea, because as far as I know, there are
already some countries that are already doing it. What is new however, is that
very recently, artificial intelligence (AI) is now being used to match the
profiles of the prospective employees with the “wish lists” of the prospective
employees, hence removing or avoiding the mismatch problem.
Again, for lack of a better term, it could be said
that the prospective hires are already “spoken for” by the prospective
employers, as if they are already “betrothed”, to liken it to a wedding
engagement. In a manner of speaking, the “betrothed” person is already
technically an employee of the company because of the “engagement”, like the
way that a cadet of the Philippine Military Academy (PMA) is already
technically an officer of the armed forces even if he or she is still studying.
From an overall perspective, it is cheaper for the
employers to adopt this approach, because it will save them money from the high
costs of recruitment. Aside from that, it will save them money from the high
costs of attrition, due to high employee turnovers caused by too many new hires
that are not the perfect fits for the job openings. In these cases, it is not
only the employers who suffer, but also the employees, because they must look
for new jobs again, once they resign or if they are fired from their jobs.
Based on my own experience, it is a good practice to
invite graduating students to genuine “On the Job” (OJT) training programs. What
I mean by “genuine” is that it really must be a real OJT program where the student
gains by gaining new knowledge. What I mean by “fake” are those haphazard
assignments where students are just asked to make coffee and make photocopies. I
have supervised many OJT programs myself, that is why I know what I am talking
about.
What happens in a genuine OJT program is the employers
will get a chance to discover who the good candidates are, and they will also
be able to measure and validate their skills. On the other hand, the students
will also be able to get an inside view of who the better employers are. This could
be a two-way street, because it could become a “seller’s market” if the prospective
employee is a prized catch.
Mr. President, with your help, you could convince the employers
in both the private sector and the government to implement this idea of using
AI to solve the problem of job mismatch. For this idea to really work, they
should provide an allowance to the OJT participants, at least to cover their
transportation and meal expenses. Sad to say, there are some companies that are
not giving anything to their OJT participants, and some companies are even charging
the students, for them to be accepted into the OJT programs. IKE SENERES/09-26-2024
Comments
Post a Comment