INTER-OPERABILITY OF GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
INTER-OPERABILITY OF GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
Dear Mr. President: Since the
time that you have been calling for the
digitalization of government processes, I have observed that both National Government
Agencies (NGAs) and Local Government Units (LGUs) have been very slow in responding
to your instructions. Why has it been difficult for these government units to
obey your orders? Is it because the heads of these units do not know what to do?
Or is it because they do not have the right people who could implement
Information and Communications Technology (ICT) projects? If that is so, why
don’t they hire contractors or consultants to do it for them?
As a former Director
General of the National Computer Center (NCC is the precursor of the Department
of Information and Communications Technology), I think that I might know some
of the answers to those questions. But to be able to answer those questions, I must
go back to the fact that even before the arrival of digital information and
communications technologies, most NGAs and LGUs have not been actively coordinating
and cooperating with each other. In other words, they really do not have a
history of being “inter-operable”.
From an internal
point of view (meaning within the government), NGAs and LGUs must be able to
access each other’s ICT systems and networks, for them to be able to claim that
they are “inter-operable”. No, I do not mean being able to exchange messages
with each other. I mean being able to read each other’s secure databases, but
with the proper security access protocols of course. And if the protocols and
policies will allow it, they should be able to input data to each other’s databases
(meaning be able to write texts and numbers into these). And that means they must
be able to sign in or log in to each other’s databases.
From an
external point of view (meaning from the perspective of the public), the people
should be able to access these government databases via a single sign in or
single log in protocol, instead of having to sign in or log in each time that
they need to transact with any government agency. That is my definition of
being “inter-operable”, and I welcome everyone else to send to me their own
definition.
Nowadays, a “single
sign on” (SSO) protocol could just simply mean one having one ID that will be
honored by all government databases, either internally or externally. But of course,
the technology for the ID could vary, such as using Quick Response (QR) codes,
Universal Product Codes (UPC codes, or commonly known as barcodes) and Near
Field Communications (NFC), among others. Any of these could also be
supplemented by biometric technologies such as facial recognition, voice
recognition, gait recognition and even eye recognition (retinal method).
Mr. President, depending on
the level of technology needed, the government database could use two or more means
of authentication, often could two-factor authentication or triple-factor authentication
for example. The simplest method that is known to most people is the one-time
password (OTP) sent via text or email. For as long as the government could
implement any SSO method, then their goals of “inter-operability” could happen
as they have been trying to make it happen. IKE SENERES/09-20-2024
Comments
Post a Comment