HOW SINGAPORE IS SOLVING ITS FLOOD PROBLEM
HOW SINGAPORE IS SOLVING ITS FLOOD PROBLEM
Singapore is now
using “smart drains” to solve its flooding problem. These are not magic drains
or science-fiction gadgets—they are simply well-engineered, sensor-equipped
drainage systems that monitor rainfall, water levels, and flow rates in real
time. When heavy rain comes, they automatically open gates or adjust flow
channels to move excess water away from vulnerable areas.
Whatever
Singapore is doing is not rocket science. Whatever they could do, we could also
do. In fact, I am willing to bet that we have more engineers than
Singapore—perhaps even better ones. The question is not about skill. The
question is about honesty, governance, and planning. And here, I’m not so
confident.
I am sure
Singapore has better long-term planning than us. I am also sure their
construction projects are not constantly interrupted by graft and corruption.
That is why their drainage system is admired by most modern nations—and why we
should be taking notes.
Singapore’s
approach is not just about digging bigger drains. It’s a whole system:
·
At the source, they slow down water right where
it starts—through green roofs, rain gardens, and retention ponds.
·
Along the pathway, they widen and deepen drains
and canals to carry larger volumes.
·
At the receptor, they protect flood-prone areas
with barriers, crest protection, and elevated platforms.
On top of that,
pump stations in low-lying areas push excess water to reservoirs or directly to
the sea. The whole system is linked to a central control network, allowing
authorities to respond instantly. In other words, they don’t wait for the flood
before acting—they see it coming.
They even
involve their citizens. Residents help maintain drains, report blockages, and
take part in flood awareness campaigns. This is another difference: in
Singapore, people see public infrastructure as something to protect, not just
to use and abuse.
With climate
change making extreme weather more frequent, Singapore has future-proofed its
drainage designs. Their Public Utilities Board constantly updates flood
management strategies based on rising rainfall intensity and ongoing
urbanization. Developers are also part of the solution—since 2014, all new or
redeveloped sites must have on-site detention tanks or green infrastructure to
slow water before it hits public drains.
Now, here’s my
point: adopting this system in the Philippines is possible. It’s not an issue
of engineering complexity—it’s about political will and proper governance. If
we truly wanted to, we could send a technical mission to Singapore tomorrow. We
could ask them to help us design a similar system tailored for Metro Manila,
Cebu, Davao, or any other flood-prone city.
Perhaps we
could instruct our Embassy in Singapore to formally approach their government.
It would cost less than the damage from just one big flood in Manila. And the
benefits—saved lives, protected property, uninterrupted business—would last for
decades.
The sad reality
is that we keep reacting to floods instead of preventing them. We have the
talent, we have the technology (or can get it), and we certainly have the need.
What we lack is the discipline to think long-term and the integrity to execute
without corruption eating away at every stage.
Singapore
proves that floods in a dense, urban, tropical city can be managed effectively.
The Philippines could do the same—if we stop making excuses and start making
plans.
Ramon Ike V. Seneres,
www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com,
senseneres.blogspot.com
10-10-2025
Comments
Post a Comment