WHAT DOES THE CABINET CLEANSING MEAN?
WHAT DOES THE CABINET CLEANSING MEAN?
Executive
Secretary Lucas Bersamin recently described the cabinet reshuffle initiated by
President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. as a form of “cleansing.” This choice of words,
while possibly intended as metaphorical or symbolic, carries with it heavy
connotations. Naturally, the public is left to ask: what exactly is being
cleansed? Does this imply the presence of incompetence, underperformance, or
worse—corruption—within the President’s official family?
The original
context of the cabinet revamp, as earlier stated by the Palace, was to “recalibrate” the administration—a
seemingly more neutral term that suggests adjusting strategies and personnel to
better align with the administration’s evolving priorities and the expectations
of the Filipino people. This recalibration, we were told, aimed at achieving a
faster, more efficient, and more results-driven government. It was framed as a
technical and strategic move rather than a punitive or disciplinary action. Yet
now, with “cleansing” introduced into the political vocabulary, it risks giving
the impression that certain officials were removed not for being slow or
underperforming, but for being unethical or untrustworthy.
This narrative
unfairly casts a shadow on those who were let go—particularly on former DENR
Secretary Toni Yulo-Loyzaga, a well-respected figure in environmental
governance. She was reportedly not even afforded the opportunity to explain or
defend her record publicly. By framing her departure within a so-called
“cleansing,” the administration opens itself to criticism that it has,
wittingly or not, smeared the reputations of individuals without evidence of
wrongdoing.
It’s also worth
examining how the other cabinet changes have been treated. Department of Human
Settlements and Urban Development (DHSUD) Secretary Jerry Acuzar, for instance,
was reassigned instead of being
removed, despite having been widely reported as having “overpromised and
underdelivered” on housing targets. If his shortcoming was primarily speed and
execution, then is this considered a lesser offense than whatever Secretary
Loyzaga was perceived to have done—or failed to do? Or does this reveal an
uneven standard of accountability?
Interestingly,
the appointment of Foreign Affairs Secretary Maria Theresa “Tess” Lazaro has
been met with praise. Her rise to the position is being viewed as a reward for her
loyalty to the service and her good track record of diplomacy. Yet even her
promotion raises a question: if some are being “cleansed,” are others being
“purified” or rewarded on purely political grounds?
Using the word
“cleansing” in government reshuffles is dangerous because it is imprecise and
suggestive. It invites speculation, casts doubt on the integrity of those replaced
and often does so without transparent justification. If the real goal of this
cabinet revamp is to improve governance through a merit-based evaluation of Key
Performance Indicators (KPIs), then let it be known as such. Government should
strive for clarity, fairness, and transparency—particularly when public
servants’ reputations and careers are at stake.
Ultimately,
Filipinos deserve to know: was this a recalibration, a reshuffle, or a purge?
Words matter—especially when they affect public trust in governance and the
dignity of those who serve.
Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com
06-24-2025
Comments
Post a Comment