IT’S TIME TO TEST MOSQUIRIX IN PALAWAN

IT’S TIME TO TEST MOSQUIRIX IN PALAWAN

To my surprise—and perhaps yours too—the Anopheles mosquito, the primary carrier of malaria, is still very much alive and buzzing… in Palawan.

We often talk about dengue and its deadly impact, but we forget that malaria is quietly lingering in the shadows. According to recent data, 6,188 out of the 6,248 malaria cases in the Philippines came from Palawan. That’s more than 99%. So, if we're going to act on malaria at all, we clearly know where to start.

For those unfamiliar with the disease: malaria is caused by Plasmodium parasites, spread through the bites of infected female Anopheles mosquitoes. These parasites enter the bloodstream, head for the liver, multiply, and eventually infect red blood cells—bringing with them fever, chills, headaches, and in severe cases, anemia, organ failure, or even cerebral malaria.

Now here’s where the conversation gets more urgent—and hopeful.

There is a vaccine. It’s called Mosquirix (scientific name: RTS, S/AS01). Developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) in collaboration with the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative and supported in part by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Mosquirix has shown promising results in African pilot programs. According online sources, the vaccine reduces hospital admissions from severe malaria by 30% and decreases toddler deaths by 15%. And yet—despite those impressive numbers—it’s not yet being used here in the Philippines.

Let me ask, why not?

I have searched for any sign that our Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been approached for approval, either by GSK’s local office or by any interested government entity. But there’s radio silence. Given the urgency and the focused need in Palawan, one would expect at least a pilot test or an application for importation. Sadly, nothing so far.

What makes this frustrating is that unlike during the COVID-19 pandemic, when we were forced to use hastily approved vaccines out of desperation, Mosquirix has already gone through years of trials and real-world testing. The World Health Organization (WHO) itself has recommended it for use in children in malaria-endemic areas. If that’s not a green light, I don’t know what is.

So, let’s talk action.

If Palawan is the clear hotspot, then why not begin our pilot testing there? With the right coordination, this can be done swiftly and effectively. The infrastructure exists: we have regional hospitals, local government units, and even NGOs on the ground who are used to working with public health programs. All we need is the political will and the bureaucratic coordination.

May I humbly suggest a few steps?

·       Let’s start with GSK’s local office. Surely, they can initiate the FDA application and coordinate with their UK headquarters.

·       Let’s involve Microsoft’s local office as well. While they didn’t develop Mosquirix, they’re heavily invested in global health data and public health analytics. They could help us connect with key decision-makers or aid with vaccine tracking tools.

·       The Department of Health (DOH) can immediately reach out to the WHO regional office to align with international standards.

·       The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) can instruct our embassies in London and Washington D.C. to open lines with GSK and global health partners.

·       And of course, the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) can offer regulatory guidance and incentives for private-public collaboration.

Let me also point out something we tend to overlook: the Philippines is a mosquito-prone country. We already know about dengue and now malaria—but who knows what other mosquito-borne diseases could surface in the future? Climate change, increased travel, and urbanization are only raising the risks.

So I ask: why not build a long-term national mosquito-borne disease defense strategy, and let the Mosquirix pilot in Palawan be the first test case?

If we move decisively now, we can position the Philippines as a regional leader in tropical disease control—instead of always playing catch-up. We’ve done it before in disaster response and digital payments. Why not in public health?

In closing, let me reiterate that inaction is also a decision—and often a costly one. We have a tool. We have the data. We have a clearly identified problem area. All that’s missing is for someone to say: “Let’s begin.”

Let that someone be us.

Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com

08-12-2025

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES?

HOW IS THE CRIME RATE COMPUTED IN THE PHILIPPINES? When we talk about the crime rate in the Philippines, we often assume that the figures we see are accurate reflections of reality. But have we ever paused to ask—how exactly is the crime rate computed? Where does this data come from, and how reliable is it? The computation of the crime rate in the Philippines is officially handled by the Philippine National Police (PNP). The formula itself is straightforward: Crime Rate = (Total Reported Crimes / Total Population) x 100,000 This simple equation gives us the number of crimes per 100,000 people, allowing for fair comparison across regions and time periods. However, the reality behind these numbers is more complex than it appears. Data from the Ground The foundation of our national crime rate is empirical data collected at the grassroots level—from individual police stations scattered across the country. Every reported crime is logged in local police blotters, forming the buil...
Read more

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS

GREY AREAS IN GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS Dear Mr. President: May I ask who is going to be the arbiter or referee whenever there are overlaps in functions between two or more government agencies? I imagine that there would be no problem if these agencies would just cooperate and collaborate with each other, but what if they are unable to settle their differences and they would just end up throwing blame at each other or finger pointing at each other? Allow me to cite some examples. Who is supposed to take the lead in waste to energy projects? Is it supposed to be the DENR that is supposed to handle waste? Or is it supposed to be the DOE that is supposed to handle energy generation? Or is it supposed to be the DILG since it is the one that could direct or influence the waste to energy projects of LGUs? Who is supposed to take the lead in producing and promoting the use of biofuels? Is it supposed to be the DA, since the production of biofuels is supposed to be all about planting biofuel ...
Read more

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES

LOCALIZED FREE AMBULANCE SERVICES As it is supposed to be, anyone in the Philippines should be able to dial 911, and a telephone operator should be able to dispatch fire, rescue, ambulance and police (FRAP) units as soon as possible, based on acceptable response times. I invented the FRAP acronym for easy recall, and I hope it sticks, if there is no other alternative. Unfortunately, due to a mixture of technical and political reasons, the Philippines has not adopted 911 as a national number, because some LGUs would rather use their own three-digit numbers such as 117 and 168. I actually proposed a technical solution to that problem, but it was not adopted either. For whatever it is worth, my solution is to install a call forwarding system that could route all calls to a central operator, regardless of what number is dialed. It is very sad for me to know that up to now, even if our country is already over one hundred years old, there are still many LGUs that do not have fire trucks. it ...
Read more