A FASTER CABINET MEANS BETTER GOVERNANCE
A FASTER CABINET MEANS BETTER GOVERNANCE
President
Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. (PBBM) made headlines with a bold
move: he called for the courtesy resignations of his cabinet members, stating
the need to “recalibrate” the government. The word “recalibrate” is
interesting—it suggests a machine that has drifted from its optimal settings.
But semantically, there’s a small but important distinction to be made… it is
not the government that needs recalibration; it is the administration. Governments are institutions
that persist; administrations are temporary stewards. This rhetorical nuance
matters, especially in times when public trust in institutions is under strain.
So, what exactly
does PBBM mean by “recalibration”? Is this an admission that some parts of his
administration have veered off course or failed to meet their objectives? It
would seem so. He emphasized the need for “renewed alignment, faster execution,
and a results-first mindset.” That’s a polite way of saying some cabinet
members may have become misaligned with the administration’s goals, are lagging
in performance, or are failing to deliver meaningful results.
From a
governance standpoint, this self-awareness is both timely and necessary. The
challenges the Philippines faces today—ranging from economic recovery to food
security, energy sustainability to climate resilience—require a Cabinet that is
dynamic, decisive, and deeply in sync with both presidential directives and
public expectations. Bureaucratic sluggishness, political infighting, or a lack
of initiative from key departments can quickly turn promising plans into
unrealized blueprints.
Calling for
courtesy resignations is not unprecedented, but it is unusual at this scale and
point in a term. It sends a strong message that complacency will not be
tolerated. However, it also reveals a possible lack of internal cohesion in the
administration. After all, if a Cabinet is well-selected, aligned, and
performing effectively, such a sweeping move would not be necessary.
Still, the President
deserves credit for acknowledging the need for recalibration. Inaction would
have been worse. This call also opens the door to appointing new faces—possibly
technocrats, policy reformers, or even private sector veterans—who can bring
fresh perspectives and greater urgency to national programs. The business of
governance is not only about vision; it’s about execution, and execution
requires speed, clarity, and unity of purpose.
That said,
transitions must be managed with care. Uncertainty or infighting during
reshuffles can paralyze departments or delay key projects. A faster Cabinet
must not only be quick to act, but also deeply rooted in expertise and public
service ethos. Speed must not come at the cost of transparency or
accountability.
In the end, if
this recalibration leads to stronger leadership, clearer direction, and faster,
more inclusive development, then it will have served its purpose. The people
will not judge PBBM by the number of resignations he accepts, but by the
progress his administration makes afterward. Governance is not just about who
sits in power—it’s about how effectively they deliver.
A faster
Cabinet may well be the key to better governance. But only if that speed is
matched with integrity, competence, and results that uplift the everyday lives
of Filipinos.
Ramon
Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres
iseneres@yahoo.com,
09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com
Comments
Post a Comment